PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRM vs. TCEHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRM vs. TCEHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRM achieves a -37.06% return, which is significantly lower than TCEHY's -21.95% return. Over the past 10 years, CRM has underperformed TCEHY with an annualized return of 7.60%, while TCEHY has yielded a comparatively higher 12.11% annualized return.


CRM

1D
-0.34%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
-37.06%
6M
-36.31%
1Y
-35.16%
3Y*
-6.88%
5Y*
-6.82%
10Y*
7.60%

TCEHY

1D
-0.20%
1M
1.46%
YTD
-21.95%
6M
-23.21%
1Y
-7.81%
3Y*
11.40%
5Y*
-2.94%
10Y*
12.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRM vs. TCEHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
-37.06%-20.25%27.76%98.46%-47.83%14.20%36.82%18.74%33.98%49.33%
TCEHY
Tencent Holdings Limited
-21.95%45.23%41.92%-5.48%-24.97%-18.69%50.09%21.93%-23.83%115.30%

Correlation

The correlation between CRM and TCEHY is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2008

0.31

The correlation between CRM and TCEHY shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.32 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRM:

$144.49B

TCEHY:

$541.76B

EPS

CRM:

$8.59

TCEHY:

CN¥25.30

PE Ratio

CRM:

19.31

TCEHY:

15.81

PEG Ratio

CRM:

0.04

TCEHY:

1.97

PS Ratio

CRM:

3.62

TCEHY:

4.84

PB Ratio

CRM:

4.22

TCEHY:

3.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRM:

$42.83B

TCEHY:

CN¥763.32B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRM:

$33.25B

TCEHY:

CN¥422.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

CRM:

$12.32B

TCEHY:

CN¥324.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRM vs. TCEHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRM
CRM Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
CRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRM Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
CRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRM Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

TCEHY
TCEHY Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
TCEHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCEHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCEHY Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
TCEHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCEHY Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRM vs. TCEHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRMTCEHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

0.97

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.95

-0.25

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.78

-0.52

-1.26

CRM vs. TCEHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRM Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is lower than the TCEHY Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRM and TCEHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRM vs. TCEHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRM drawdown since its inception was -70.50%, roughly equal to the maximum TCEHY drawdown of -73.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRM and TCEHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRMTCEHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.50%

-73.17%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.36%

-36.75%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.70%

-36.75%

-17.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.62%

-66.13%

+7.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.62%

-73.17%

+14.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.33%

-32.71%

-21.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.15%

-19.72%

+3.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.92%

17.42%

+3.50%

Volatility

CRM vs. TCEHY - Volatility Comparison

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) has a higher volatility of 16.76% compared to Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY) at 12.15%. This indicates that CRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCEHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRMTCEHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.76%

12.15%

+4.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.59%

24.73%

+6.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.09%

30.90%

+7.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.07%

43.23%

-6.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.38%

38.83%

-3.45%

Dividends

CRM vs. TCEHY - Dividend Comparison

CRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than TCEHY's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
1.28%0.63%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TCEHY
Tencent Holdings Limited
1.15%0.76%0.82%6.67%4.15%0.35%0.19%0.23%0.26%0.29%0.51%0.21%

Financials

CRM vs. TCEHY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Salesforce, Inc. and Tencent Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
11.13B
195.27B
(CRM) Total Revenue
(TCEHY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CRM values in USD, TCEHY values in CNY

CRM vs. TCEHY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Salesforce, Inc. and Tencent Holdings Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
76.9%
54.6%
Portfolio components
CRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.56B and revenue of 11.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.

TCEHY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 106.58B and revenue of 195.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.6%.

CRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.35B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

TCEHY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 65.72B and revenue of 195.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.7%.

CRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a net income of 2.11B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.

TCEHY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported a net income of 57.74B and revenue of 195.27B, resulting in a net margin of 29.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRM and TCEHY have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRM has higher volatility (16.76%) compared to TCEHY (12.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRM dropped -70.50% vs TCEHY's -73.17%.

TCEHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.29 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRM and TCEHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer