PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCEHY vs. NIO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TCEHY vs. NIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY) and NIO Inc. (NIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCEHY achieves a -20.27% return, which is significantly lower than NIO's 17.84% return.


TCEHY

1D
9.10%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
-20.27%
6M
-22.90%
1Y
-4.93%
3Y*
13.21%
5Y*
-2.81%
10Y*
12.08%

NIO

1D
0.50%
1M
1.69%
YTD
17.84%
6M
19.48%
1Y
70.74%
3Y*
-7.36%
5Y*
-31.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCEHY vs. NIO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TCEHY
Tencent Holdings Limited
-20.27%45.23%41.92%-5.48%-24.97%-18.69%50.09%21.93%-0.90%
NIO
NIO Inc.
17.84%16.97%-51.93%-6.97%-69.22%-35.00%1,112.44%-36.89%-3.48%

Correlation

The correlation between TCEHY and NIO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018

0.44

The correlation between TCEHY and NIO shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TCEHY:

$553.41B

NIO:

$14.91B

EPS

TCEHY:

$25.30

NIO:

-$3.74

PS Ratio

TCEHY:

0.73

NIO:

0.14

PB Ratio

TCEHY:

0.49

NIO:

3.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

TCEHY:

$763.32B

NIO:

$100.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TCEHY:

$422.60B

NIO:

$15.77B

EBITDA (TTM)

TCEHY:

$324.78B

NIO:

-$7.54B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCEHY vs. NIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCEHY
TCEHY Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
TCEHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCEHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCEHY Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
TCEHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCEHY Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

NIO
NIO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
NIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
NIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCEHY vs. NIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY) and NIO Inc. (NIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCEHYNIODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.16

1.13

-1.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.02

1.90

-1.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.21

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.08

1.60

-1.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.17

2.89

-3.05

TCEHY vs. NIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCEHY Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the NIO Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCEHY and NIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCEHYNIODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

1.13

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

-0.45

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

-0.01

+0.67

Drawdowns

TCEHY vs. NIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCEHY drawdown since its inception was -73.17%, smaller than the maximum NIO drawdown of -95.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCEHY and NIO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCEHYNIODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.17%

-95.00%

+21.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.75%

-43.73%

+6.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.75%

-79.69%

+42.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.67%

-94.10%

+27.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.26%

-90.44%

+59.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.66%

-67.84%

+48.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.42%

24.19%

-7.77%

Volatility

TCEHY vs. NIO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY) is 12.23%, while NIO Inc. (NIO) has a volatility of 18.54%. This indicates that TCEHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCEHYNIODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.23%

18.54%

-6.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.21%

41.30%

-17.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.62%

62.81%

-32.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.23%

71.65%

-28.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.83%

86.73%

-47.90%

Dividends

TCEHY vs. NIO - Dividend Comparison

TCEHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while NIO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NIO
NIO Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TCEHY
Tencent Holdings Limited
1.12%0.76%0.82%6.67%4.15%0.35%0.19%0.23%0.26%0.29%0.51%0.21%

Financials

TCEHY vs. NIO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tencent Holdings Limited and NIO Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
195.27B
25.53B
(TCEHY) Total Revenue
(NIO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TCEHY vs. NIO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tencent Holdings Limited and NIO Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
54.6%
19.0%
Portfolio components
TCEHY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 106.58B and revenue of 195.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.6%.

NIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIO Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.86B and revenue of 25.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.0%.

TCEHY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 65.72B and revenue of 195.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.7%.

NIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIO Inc. reported an operating income of -308.81M and revenue of 25.53B, resulting in an operating margin of -1.2%.

TCEHY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported a net income of 57.74B and revenue of 195.27B, resulting in a net margin of 29.6%.

NIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIO Inc. reported a net income of -496.01M and revenue of 25.53B, resulting in a net margin of -1.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TCEHY and NIO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NIO has higher volatility (18.54%) compared to TCEHY (12.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCEHY dropped -73.17% vs NIO's -95.00%.

NIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCEHY and NIO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer