PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRM vs. AMZN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRM vs. AMZN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in salesforce.com, inc. (CRM) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRM achieves a -27.87% return, which is significantly lower than AMZN's 8.32% return. Over the past 10 years, CRM has underperformed AMZN with an annualized return of 8.89%, while AMZN has yielded a comparatively higher 21.29% annualized return.


CRM

1D
-5.09%
1M
2.77%
YTD
-27.87%
6M
-19.82%
1Y
-27.39%
3Y*
-3.17%
5Y*
-4.02%
10Y*
8.89%

AMZN

1D
-2.53%
1M
-8.10%
YTD
8.32%
6M
7.59%
1Y
21.54%
3Y*
26.25%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
21.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRM vs. AMZN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRM
salesforce.com, inc.
-27.87%-20.25%27.76%98.46%-47.83%14.20%36.82%18.74%33.98%49.33%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
8.32%5.21%44.39%80.88%-49.62%2.38%76.26%23.03%28.43%55.96%

Correlation

The correlation between CRM and AMZN is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2004

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between CRM and AMZN has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRM:

$166.02B

AMZN:

$2.72T

EPS

CRM:

$8.59

AMZN:

$8.37

PE Ratio

CRM:

22.18

AMZN:

29.87

PEG Ratio

CRM:

0.05

AMZN:

0.72

PS Ratio

CRM:

4.16

AMZN:

3.65

PB Ratio

CRM:

4.85

AMZN:

6.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRM:

$42.83B

AMZN:

$742.78B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRM:

$33.25B

AMZN:

$348.59B

EBITDA (TTM)

CRM:

$12.32B

AMZN:

$152.71B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRM vs. AMZN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRM
CRM Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRM Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
CRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRM Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZN
AMZN Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
AMZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZN Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZN Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRM vs. AMZN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for salesforce.com, inc. (CRM) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRMAMZNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.73

0.72

-1.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.89

1.18

-2.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.15

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

1.00

-1.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.36

2.39

-3.75

CRM vs. AMZN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRM Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the AMZN Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRM and AMZN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRMAMZNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.73

0.72

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

0.26

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.66

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.57

-0.11

Drawdowns

CRM vs. AMZN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRM drawdown since its inception was -70.50%, smaller than the maximum AMZN drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRM and AMZN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRMAMZNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.50%

-94.40%

+23.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.46%

-21.74%

-17.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.70%

-30.88%

-23.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.62%

-56.15%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.62%

-56.15%

-2.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.66%

-9.08%

-38.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.10%

-28.12%

+12.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.18%

9.02%

+11.16%

Volatility

CRM vs. AMZN - Volatility Comparison

salesforce.com, inc. (CRM) has a higher volatility of 17.31% compared to Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) at 7.24%. This indicates that CRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRMAMZNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.31%

7.24%

+10.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.96%

20.35%

+11.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.89%

30.00%

+7.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.02%

35.50%

+1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.34%

32.46%

+2.88%

Dividends

CRM vs. AMZN - Dividend Comparison

CRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while AMZN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%
CRM
salesforce.com, inc.
0.89%0.63%0.48%

Financials

CRM vs. AMZN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between salesforce.com, inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
11.13B
181.52B
(CRM) Total Revenue
(AMZN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CRM vs. AMZN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between salesforce.com, inc. and Amazon.com, Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
76.9%
36.8%
Portfolio components
CRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, salesforce.com, inc. reported a gross profit of 8.56B and revenue of 11.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.

AMZN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a gross profit of 66.77B and revenue of 181.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

CRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, salesforce.com, inc. reported an operating income of 2.35B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

AMZN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported an operating income of 23.85B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.

CRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, salesforce.com, inc. reported a net income of 2.11B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.

AMZN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a net income of 30.26B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRM and AMZN have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRM has higher volatility (17.31%) compared to AMZN (7.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRM dropped -70.50% vs AMZN's -94.40%.

AMZN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRM and AMZN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer