CRH.L vs. TDGB.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

CRH.L (CRH plc) is a stock, while TDGB.L (VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF) is Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CRH.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in CRH plc (CRH.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CRH.L is traded in GBp, while TDGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TDGB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

CRH.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TDGB.L

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -0.01%
• YTD: 8.97%
• 6M: 11.83%
• 1Y: 29.07%
• 3Y*: 20.01%
• 5Y*: 17.71%
• 10Y*: 10.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRH.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CRH.L CRH plc	-5.20%	27.27%	39.34%	72.07%	-12.07%	31.98%	4.15%	51.29%	-19.86%	-3.90%
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF	8.97%	30.90%	10.66%	9.04%	22.49%	19.59%	-5.61%	3.88%	-7.98%	2.87%

Correlation

The correlation between CRH.L and TDGB.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2016	0.48

The correlation between CRH.L and TDGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CRH.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDGB.L

TDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 92
TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
TDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
TDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 92
TDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
TDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRH.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CRH plc (CRH.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRH.L	TDGB.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.76	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CRH.L	TDGB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-32.94%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.66%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.42%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-12.42%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.42%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-4.94%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.41%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRH.L	TDGB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.30%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.02%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	9.27%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	11.43%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	13.77%	—

Dividends

CRH.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison

CRH.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than TDGB.L's 3.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRH.L CRH plc	0.96%	1.18%	1.52%	3.93%	3.70%	2.97%	2.78%	2.38%	3.30%	2.46%	2.22%	3.17%
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF	3.20%	3.50%	4.26%	4.93%	4.40%	4.06%	4.16%	4.52%	4.38%	3.48%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRH.L and TDGB.L in my portfolio?

CRH.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.