PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRH.L vs. CTY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRH.L vs. CTY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in CRH plc (CRH.L) and The City of London Investment Trust plc (CTY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CRH.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CTY.L

1D
0.18%
1M
0.72%
YTD
7.61%
6M
8.85%
1Y
20.30%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
12.33%
10Y*
8.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRH.L vs. CTY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRH.L
CRH plc
-5.20%27.27%39.34%72.07%-12.07%31.98%4.15%51.29%-19.86%-3.90%
CTY.L
The City of London Investment Trust plc
7.61%28.15%10.62%4.83%9.40%11.77%-11.85%20.50%-8.47%12.55%

Correlation

The correlation between CRH.L and CTY.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2006

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between CRH.L and CTY.L has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRH.L:

£59.51B

CTY.L:

£2.79B

EPS

CRH.L:

£9.89

CTY.L:

£1.58

PE Ratio

CRH.L:

8.89

CTY.L:

3.52

PEG Ratio

CRH.L:

0.89

CTY.L:

0.05

PS Ratio

CRH.L:

0.88

CTY.L:

3.39

PB Ratio

CRH.L:

2.48

CTY.L:

1.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRH.L:

£67.44B

CTY.L:

£816.21M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRH.L:

£24.22B

CTY.L:

£812.37M

EBITDA (TTM)

CRH.L:

£13.49B

CTY.L:

£450.99M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRH.L vs. CTY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRH.L

CTY.L
CTY.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
CTY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CTY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRH.L vs. CTY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CRH plc (CRH.L) and The City of London Investment Trust plc (CTY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CRH.L vs. CTY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRH.LCTY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

Drawdowns

CRH.L vs. CTY.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRH.LCTY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

Volatility

CRH.L vs. CTY.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRH.LCTY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

Dividends

CRH.L vs. CTY.L - Dividend Comparison

CRH.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than CTY.L's 3.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRH.L
CRH plc
0.96%1.18%1.52%3.93%3.70%2.97%2.78%2.38%3.30%2.46%2.22%3.17%
CTY.L
The City of London Investment Trust plc
3.92%4.06%4.82%4.92%4.82%4.86%5.07%4.22%4.66%3.86%1.00%3.99%

Financials

CRH.L vs. CTY.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CRH plc and The City of London Investment Trust plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20212022202320242025
11.46B
287.76M
(CRH.L) Total Revenue
(CTY.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

CRH.L vs. CTY.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CRH plc and The City of London Investment Trust plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
30.2%
98.7%
Portfolio components
CRH.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CRH plc reported a gross profit of 3.46B and revenue of 11.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.2%.

CTY.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The City of London Investment Trust plc reported a gross profit of 283.92M and revenue of 287.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.7%.

CRH.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CRH plc reported an operating income of 660.63M and revenue of 11.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.8%.

CTY.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The City of London Investment Trust plc reported an operating income of 283.29M and revenue of 287.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 98.5%.

CRH.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CRH plc reported a net income of 536.76M and revenue of 11.46B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.

CTY.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The City of London Investment Trust plc reported a net income of 280.63M and revenue of 287.76M, resulting in a net margin of 97.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRH.L and CTY.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRH.L and CTY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer