CRH.L vs. CX

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CRH plc (CRH.L) and CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX).

Performance

CRH.L vs. CX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in CRH plc (CRH.L) and CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CRH.L vs. CX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CRH.L CRH plc	-13.63%	29.19%	39.91%	70.63%	-12.91%	30.87%	3.58%	50.72%	-20.15%	-4.19%
CX CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.	-0.23%	91.29%	-25.19%	81.79%	-33.16%	32.38%	32.75%	-22.61%	-31.92%	-11.26%

Different Trading Currencies

CRH.L is traded in GBp, while CX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

EPS CRH.L : £9.89 CX : $0.99
PE Ratio CRH.L : 8.06 CX : 11.39
PEG Ratio CRH.L : 0.81 CX : 0.03
PS Ratio CRH.L : 0.80 CX : 0.68
Total Revenue (TTM) CRH.L : £67.44B CX : $16.18B
Gross Profit (TTM) CRH.L : £24.22B CX : $5.08B
EBITDA (TTM) CRH.L : £13.49B CX : $1.73B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRH.L achieves a -13.63% return, which is significantly lower than CX's 2.75% return. Over the past 10 years, CRH.L has outperformed CX with an annualized return of 17.99%, while CX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.09% annualized return.

CRH.L

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: -5.55%
• YTD: -13.63%
• 6M: -9.28%
• 1Y: 18.37%
• 3Y*: 28.59%
• 5Y*: 22.13%
• 10Y*: 17.99%

CX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.66%
• YTD: 2.75%
• 6M: 30.22%
• 1Y: 101.70%
• 3Y*: 27.12%
• 5Y*: 12.56%
• 10Y*: 7.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CRH.L vs. CX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRH.L

CRH.L Risk / Return Rank: 60
CRH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
CRH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
CRH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 53
CRH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
CRH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 67

CX

CX Risk / Return Rank: 93
CX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
CX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRH.L vs. CX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CRH plc (CRH.L) and CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRH.L	CX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.59	2.98	-2.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.08	3.55	-2.47
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.46	-0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.14	4.55	-3.40
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.32	17.44	-14.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRH.L vs. CX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRH.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the CX Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRH.L and CX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRH.L	CX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59	2.98	-2.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	0.33	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	0.17	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	-0.00	+0.47

Correlation

The correlation between CRH.L and CX is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CRH.L vs. CX - Dividend Comparison

CRH.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, more than CX's 0.80% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRH.L CRH plc	2.84%	2.40%	1.90%	3.30%	2.80%	2.25%	2.34%	2.08%	2.88%	2.15%	1.94%	2.77%
CX CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.	0.80%	0.76%	1.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CRH.L vs. CX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRH.L drawdown since its inception was -55.42%, smaller than the maximum CX drawdown of -89.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRH.L and CX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRH.L	CX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.42%	-92.37%	+36.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.91%	-23.99%	+2.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.50%	-64.00%	+34.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.99%	-83.70%	+35.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.19%	-46.18%	+28.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.29%	-51.25%	+37.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.54%	6.31%	+1.23%

Volatility

CRH.L vs. CX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CRH plc (CRH.L) is 10.40%, while CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) has a volatility of 13.87%. This indicates that CRH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRH.L	CX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.40%	13.87%	-3.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.52%	26.64%	-7.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.97%	34.38%	-3.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.81%	38.11%	-10.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.50%	41.89%	-13.39%

Financials

CRH.L vs. CX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CRH plc and CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CRH.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CRH plc reported a gross profit of 3.46B and revenue of 11.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.2%.

CX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. reported a gross profit of 1.12B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.0%.

CRH.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CRH plc reported an operating income of 660.63M and revenue of 11.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.8%.

CX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. reported an operating income of 491.35M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

CRH.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CRH plc reported a net income of 536.76M and revenue of 11.46B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.

CX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. reported a net income of -355.93M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of -8.6%.