PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRF vs. HOOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRF vs. HOOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) and YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRF achieves a -3.31% return, which is significantly higher than HOOY's -13.15% return.


CRF

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
-3.31%
6M
-1.76%
1Y
12.90%
3Y*
15.78%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*
11.48%

HOOY

1D
0.37%
1M
14.61%
YTD
-13.15%
6M
-15.59%
1Y
16.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRF vs. HOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CRF and HOOY is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRF vs. HOOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRF
CRF Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
CRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRF Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
CRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRF Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

HOOY
HOOY Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
HOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRF vs. HOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) and YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRFHOOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.09

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

0.28

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.59

0.50

+2.09

CRF vs. HOOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRF Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is higher than the HOOY Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRF and HOOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRF vs. HOOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRF drawdown since its inception was -80.70%, which is greater than HOOY's maximum drawdown of -51.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRF and HOOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRFHOOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.70%

-51.54%

-29.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.88%

-51.54%

+36.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.09%

-35.28%

+30.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.31%

-20.56%

-1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.48%

28.94%

-24.46%

Volatility

CRF vs. HOOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) is 4.16%, while YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY) has a volatility of 17.45%. This indicates that CRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRFHOOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

17.45%

-13.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.41%

42.40%

-28.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.41%

55.83%

-40.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.07%

54.40%

-29.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.86%

54.40%

-28.54%

CRF vs. HOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRF has a 1.84% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRF vs. HOOY - Dividend Comparison

CRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.63%, less than HOOY's 155.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRF
Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.
19.63%17.38%14.32%19.94%29.31%13.41%18.91%21.67%24.85%17.96%24.08%23.58%
HOOY
YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF
155.65%82.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRF and HOOY have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOOY has higher volatility (17.45%) compared to CRF (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRF dropped -80.70% vs HOOY's -51.54%.

CRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRF and HOOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer