PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRED vs. HYSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRED vs. HYSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF (CRED) and Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF (HYSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRED achieves a 14.93% return, which is significantly higher than HYSD's 1.97% return.


CRED

1D
1.10%
1M
0.50%
YTD
14.93%
6M
16.10%
1Y
10.84%
3Y*
10.63%
5Y*
10Y*

HYSD

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.97%
6M
2.16%
1Y
5.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRED vs. HYSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CRED
Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF
14.93%-2.30%-3.86%
HYSD
Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF
1.97%7.74%0.94%

Correlation

The correlation between CRED and HYSD is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRED vs. HYSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRED
CRED Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CRED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRED Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRED Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CRED Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRED Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

HYSD
HYSD Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
HYSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYSD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HYSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYSD Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRED vs. HYSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF (CRED) and Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF (HYSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CREDHYSDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.43

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

4.09

-2.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.95

17.66

-14.71

CRED vs. HYSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRED Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the HYSD Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRED and HYSD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRED vs. HYSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRED drawdown since its inception was -17.59%, which is greater than HYSD's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRED and HYSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CREDHYSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.59%

-2.69%

-14.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.32%

-1.46%

-6.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-0.11%

-1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.57%

-0.25%

-5.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

0.34%

+3.34%

Volatility

CRED vs. HYSD - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF (CRED) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF (HYSD) at 0.84%. This indicates that CRED's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CREDHYSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

0.84%

+3.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.02%

2.22%

+7.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.34%

2.83%

+10.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.27%

3.50%

+12.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.27%

3.50%

+12.77%

CRED vs. HYSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRED has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than HYSD's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRED vs. HYSD - Dividend Comparison

CRED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, less than HYSD's 5.79% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CRED
Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF
4.43%5.50%4.82%2.72%
HYSD
Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF
5.79%5.60%1.82%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRED and HYSD have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRED has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to HYSD (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRED dropped -17.59% vs HYSD's -2.69%.

On 1-year performance, CRED leads with 10.84% vs 5.94% for HYSD. On fees, CRED is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, HYSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CRED has performed better with a 10.84% return vs 5.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CRED is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for HYSD.

HYSD has the higher dividend yield at 5.79%, compared with 4.43% for CRED.

CRED is categorized as REIT, while HYSD is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CRED and 0.44% for HYSD.

HYSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRED and HYSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer