CRDT vs. HIGH

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

CRDT (Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF) and HIGH (Simplify Enhanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRDT is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify, while HIGH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CRDT returned 3.97%/yr vs 2.59%/yr for HIGH. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

CRDT vs. HIGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT) and Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRDT achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly higher than HIGH's -0.98% return.

CRDT

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 0.92%
• 6M: 0.73%
• YTD: 2.76%
• 1Y: 3.31%
• 3Y*: 3.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HIGH

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -0.51%
• 6M: -0.76%
• YTD: -0.98%
• 1Y: -3.50%
• 3Y*: 2.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRDT vs. HIGH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CRDT Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF	2.76%	-0.67%	5.19%	5.20%
HIGH Simplify Enhanced Income ETF	-0.98%	4.35%	1.52%	3.15%

Correlation

The correlation between CRDT and HIGH is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2023	0.19

Return for Risk

CRDT vs. HIGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRDT

CRDT Risk / Return Rank: 16
CRDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
CRDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
CRDT Omega Ratio Rank: 15
CRDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
CRDT Martin Ratio Rank: 19

HIGH

HIGH Risk / Return Rank: 5
HIGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
HIGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
HIGH Omega Ratio Rank: 5
HIGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
HIGH Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRDT vs. HIGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT) and Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRDT	HIGH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	-0.49	+0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.55	-0.67	+1.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	0.92	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.46	-0.50	+0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.59	-0.81	+2.39

CRDT vs. HIGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRDT Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is higher than the HIGH Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRDT and HIGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRDT vs. HIGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRDT drawdown since its inception was -9.80%, roughly equal to the maximum HIGH drawdown of -9.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDT and HIGH.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRDT	HIGH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.80%	-9.50%	-0.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.18%	-7.08%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.80%	-9.50%	-0.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.48%	-7.68%	+5.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.32%	-2.53%	+0.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	4.36%	-2.27%

Volatility

CRDT vs. HIGH - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) at 1.80%. This indicates that CRDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRDT	HIGH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.76%	1.80%	+1.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.84%	3.77%	+5.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.50%	7.26%	+2.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.40%	9.48%	-2.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.40%	9.48%	-2.08%

CRDT vs. HIGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CRDT and HIGH have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

CRDT vs. HIGH - Dividend Comparison

CRDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.13%, less than HIGH's 7.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CRDT Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF	6.13%	7.04%	7.29%	2.59%	0.00%
HIGH Simplify Enhanced Income ETF	7.13%	7.71%	8.34%	9.40%	0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRDT and HIGH in my portfolio?

CRDT and HIGH have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRDT or HIGH?

CRDT has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to HIGH (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRDT dropped -9.80% vs HIGH's -9.50%.

Which ETF is better, CRDT or HIGH?

On 3-year performance, CRDT leads with 3.97% vs 2.59% for HIGH. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, HIGH has been the lower-risk option at 1.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRDT or HIGH?

Over the 3-year period, CRDT has performed better with a 3.97% return vs 2.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRDT or HIGH?

CRDT and HIGH have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRDT or HIGH?

HIGH has the higher dividend yield at 7.13%, compared with 6.13% for CRDT.

What is the main difference between CRDT and HIGH?

CRDT is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while HIGH is Derivative Income.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.