PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRDO vs. GHC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRDO vs. GHC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) and Graham Holdings Company (GHC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRDO achieves a 74.31% return, which is significantly higher than GHC's 7.23% return.


CRDO

1D
-5.27%
1M
45.68%
YTD
74.31%
6M
74.28%
1Y
241.28%
3Y*
142.90%
5Y*
10Y*

GHC

1D
1.55%
1M
7.43%
YTD
7.23%
6M
5.38%
1Y
25.98%
3Y*
28.02%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*
10.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRDO vs. GHC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
74.31%114.09%245.20%46.28%10.00%
GHC
Graham Holdings Company
7.23%26.98%26.32%16.56%4.95%

Correlation

The correlation between CRDO and GHC is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022

0.22

Over the past year, the correlation between CRDO and GHC has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.22, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRDO:

$48.33B

GHC:

$7.77M

EPS

CRDO:

$2.50

GHC:

$90.63

PE Ratio

CRDO:

100.50

GHC:

12.96

PEG Ratio

CRDO:

0.09

GHC:

0.15

PS Ratio

CRDO:

35.55

GHC:

1.03

PB Ratio

CRDO:

23.42

GHC:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRDO:

$1.34B

GHC:

$3.75B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRDO:

$908.35M

GHC:

$1.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

CRDO:

$463.79M

GHC:

$722.08M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRDO vs. GHC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRDO
CRDO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CRDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

GHC
GHC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHC Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHC Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRDO vs. GHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) and Graham Holdings Company (GHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRDOGHCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.18

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.46

1.25

+3.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.76

3.29

+7.47

CRDO vs. GHC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRDO Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the GHC Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRDO and GHC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRDO vs. GHC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRDO drawdown since its inception was -62.04%, smaller than the maximum GHC drawdown of -67.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDO and GHC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRDOGHCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.04%

-67.54%

+5.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.59%

-19.78%

-33.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.05%

-19.78%

-41.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.27%

-1.32%

-3.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.38%

-19.30%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.17%

7.51%

+14.66%

Volatility

CRDO vs. GHC - Volatility Comparison

Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) has a higher volatility of 28.41% compared to Graham Holdings Company (GHC) at 5.31%. This indicates that CRDO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRDOGHCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.41%

5.31%

+23.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

65.16%

15.88%

+49.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

85.70%

26.54%

+59.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.50%

26.03%

+55.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.50%

28.28%

+53.22%

Dividends

CRDO vs. GHC - Dividend Comparison

CRDO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GHC
Graham Holdings Company
0.63%0.66%0.79%0.95%1.05%0.96%1.09%0.87%0.83%0.91%0.95%89.61%

Financials

CRDO vs. GHC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd and Graham Holdings Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
437.00M
0
(CRDO) Total Revenue
(GHC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CRDO and GHC have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRDO has higher volatility (28.41%) compared to GHC (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRDO dropped -62.04% vs GHC's -67.54%.

CRDO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRDO and GHC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer