PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRDO vs. AMSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRDO vs. AMSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) and American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRDO achieves a 43.85% return, which is significantly higher than AMSC's 2.05% return.


CRDO

1D
2.94%
1M
-20.11%
6M
65.22%
YTD
43.85%
1Y
85.56%
3Y*
130.87%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
87.78%

AMSC

1D
-0.27%
1M
-26.43%
6M
-1.84%
YTD
2.05%
1Y
-48.34%
3Y*
22.11%
5Y*
15.89%
10Y*
12.68%
ALL TIME*
-3.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$27.27M$25.36M$48.11M
$1.17B$1.40B$1.87B

CRDO vs. AMSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
43.85%114.09%245.20%46.28%10.00%
AMSC
American Superconductor Corporation
2.05%16.85%121.10%202.72%-53.06%

Correlation

The correlation between CRDO and AMSC is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022

0.43

The correlation between CRDO and AMSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRDO:

$38.60B

AMSC:

$1.42B

EPS

CRDO:

$2.50

AMSC:

$2.95

PE Ratio

CRDO:

82.94

AMSC:

9.94

PEG Ratio

CRDO:

0.07

AMSC:

0.02

PS Ratio

CRDO:

29.34

AMSC:

4.45

PB Ratio

CRDO:

19.33

AMSC:

2.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRDO:

$1.34B

AMSC:

$299.15M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRDO:

$908.35M

AMSC:

$91.38M

EBITDA (TTM)

CRDO:

$463.79M

AMSC:

$19.29M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRDO vs. AMSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CRDO
CRDO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CRDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

AMSC
AMSC Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
AMSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMSC Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
AMSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMSC Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CRDO vs. AMSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) and American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRDOAMSCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

0.94

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

-0.79

+2.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.65

-1.21

+4.85

CRDO vs. AMSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRDO Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the AMSC Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRDO and AMSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRDO vs. AMSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRDO drawdown since its inception was -62.04%, smaller than the maximum AMSC drawdown of -99.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDO and AMSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRDOAMSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.04%

-99.57%

+37.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.59%

-61.08%

+7.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.05%

-61.08%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.58%

-95.76%

+64.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.39%

-75.83%

+56.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.55%

40.10%

-16.55%

Volatility

CRDO vs. AMSC - Volatility Comparison

Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) has a higher volatility of 29.83% compared to American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) at 22.38%. This indicates that CRDO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRDOAMSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.83%

22.38%

+7.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

73.09%

57.61%

+15.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.00%

87.44%

+4.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.43%

87.66%

-5.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.43%

79.49%

+2.94%

Dividends

CRDO vs. AMSC - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRDO nor AMSC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CRDO vs. AMSC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd and American Superconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

CRDO vs. AMSC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd and American Superconductor Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

CRDO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a gross profit of 298.07M and revenue of 437.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.

AMSC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 23.60M and revenue of 86.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.

CRDO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported an operating income of 155.85M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.7%.

AMSC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported an operating income of -522.00K and revenue of 86.41M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.6%.

CRDO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a net income of 169.10M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in a net margin of 38.7%.

AMSC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported a net income of 4.53M and revenue of 86.41M, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRDO and AMSC have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRDO has higher volatility (29.83%) compared to AMSC (22.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRDO dropped -62.04% vs AMSC's -99.57%.

CRDO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRDO and AMSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer