CRDBX vs. GIPIX
CRDBX (Potomac Defensive Bull Fund) and GIPIX (Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, CRDBX returned 15.87%/yr vs 4.72%/yr for GIPIX. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CRDBX charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for GIPIX.
Performance
CRDBX vs. GIPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRDBX achieves a 18.79% return, which is significantly higher than GIPIX's 5.42% return.
CRDBX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 6.93%
- YTD
- 18.79%
- 6M
- 18.23%
- 1Y
- 42.68%
- 3Y*
- 19.96%
- 5Y*
- 15.87%
- 10Y*
- —
GIPIX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 6M
- 5.79%
- 1Y
- 14.90%
- 3Y*
- 10.66%
- 5Y*
- 4.72%
- 10Y*
- 6.16%
CRDBX vs. GIPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDBX Potomac Defensive Bull Fund | 18.79% | 25.36% | 19.91% | 18.44% | -8.21% | 28.08% | 24.03% |
GIPIX Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio | 5.42% | 10.80% | 8.51% | 12.49% | -14.43% | 7.94% | 11.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRDBX and GIPIX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2020 | 0.53 |
The correlation between CRDBX and GIPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (5 years) to 0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRDBX vs. GIPIX — Risk / Return Rank
CRDBX
GIPIX
CRDBX vs. GIPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Potomac Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) and Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRDBX | GIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.73 | 1.45 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.21 | 2.72 | +3.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.42 | 11.88 | +8.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRDBX | GIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.13 | 2.34 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.59 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.67 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
CRDBX vs. GIPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRDBX drawdown since its inception was -28.12%, roughly equal to the maximum GIPIX drawdown of -29.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDBX and GIPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRDBX | GIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.12% | -29.46% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.13% | -5.59% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.77% | -9.11% | -8.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.12% | -20.65% | -7.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.58% | -3.68% | -2.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 1.27% | +0.89% |
Volatility
CRDBX vs. GIPIX - Volatility Comparison
Potomac Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX) at 2.18%. This indicates that CRDBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRDBX | GIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 2.18% | +1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.80% | 5.32% | +5.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.16% | 6.50% | +7.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.73% | 8.00% | +11.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.36% | 8.11% | +12.25% |
CRDBX vs. GIPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRDBX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than GIPIX's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRDBX vs. GIPIX - Dividend Comparison
CRDBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.93%, more than GIPIX's 5.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDBX Potomac Defensive Bull Fund | 12.93% | 15.36% | 12.58% | 9.91% | 0.18% | 25.05% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GIPIX Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio | 5.51% | 5.22% | 4.06% | 2.12% | 4.56% | 6.37% | 2.25% | 2.51% | 4.70% | 4.51% | 1.46% | 5.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRDBX and GIPIX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRDBX has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to GIPIX (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRDBX dropped -28.12% vs GIPIX's -29.46%.
CRDBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRDBX and GIPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer