CRCG vs. QTAP
CRCG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRCL Daily ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRCG charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.
Performance
CRCG vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRCG achieves a -58.00% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 13.22% return.
CRCG
- 1D
- -6.59%
- 1M
- -60.01%
- YTD
- -58.00%
- 6M
- -61.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTAP
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 13.22%
- 6M
- 13.12%
- 1Y
- 21.83%
- 3Y*
- 20.17%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- —
CRCG vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRCG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRCL Daily ETF | -58.00% | -83.23% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 13.22% | 4.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRCG and QTAP is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRCG vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
CRCG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QTAP
CRCG vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRCL Daily ETF (CRCG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRCG | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.91 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 8.80 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 48.87 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRCG vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRCG drawdown since its inception was -93.85%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCG and QTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRCG | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.85% | -29.44% | -64.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.09% | -1.36% | -91.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.50% | -4.99% | -65.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.45% | — |
Volatility
CRCG vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRCG | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 195.07% | 6.05% | +189.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 195.07% | 18.92% | +176.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 195.07% | 18.70% | +176.37% |
CRCG vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRCG has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRCG vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRCG nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRCG and QTAP have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRCG is cheaper at 0.78% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRCG is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTAP.
CRCG and QTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for CRCG and 0.79% for QTAP.
Find the right allocation for CRCG and QTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer