CRCD vs. RAA

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

CRCD (T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF) and RAA (SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRCD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while RAA is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by SMI Advisory Services. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.50, they often move in opposite directions. CRCD charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for RAA.

Performance

CRCD vs. RAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD) and SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRCD achieves a -79.80% return, which is significantly lower than RAA's 7.39% return.

CRCD

• 1D: 14.90%
• 1M: 41.63%
• 6M: -80.01%
• YTD: -79.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RAA

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: -1.78%
• 6M: 4.74%
• YTD: 7.39%
• 1Y: 16.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRCD vs. RAA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF	-79.80%	38.83%
RAA SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF	7.39%	3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between CRCD and RAA is -0.50, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025	-0.50

Return for Risk

CRCD vs. RAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRCD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RAA

RAA Risk / Return Rank: 62
RAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
RAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
RAA Omega Ratio Rank: 58
RAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
RAA Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRCD vs. RAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD) and SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRCD	RAA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.60	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.20	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.29	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.80	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.05	—

Drawdowns

CRCD vs. RAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRCD drawdown since its inception was -96.95%, which is greater than RAA's maximum drawdown of -11.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCD and RAA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRCD	RAA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.95%	-11.96%	-84.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-90.42%	-3.68%	-86.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-60.01%	-1.58%	-58.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.82%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRCD	RAA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.92%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.36%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	200.70%	10.32%	+190.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	200.70%	12.73%	+187.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	200.70%	12.73%	+187.97%

CRCD vs. RAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRCD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RAA's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRCD vs. RAA - Dividend Comparison

CRCD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%.

Position	TTM	2025
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%
RAA SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF	2.14%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRCD and RAA in my portfolio?

CRCD and RAA have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRCD or RAA?

On fees, RAA is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRCD or RAA?

RAA is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRCD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRCD or RAA?

RAA has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 0.00% for CRCD.

What is the main difference between CRCD and RAA?

CRCD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while RAA is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and SMI Advisory Services. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRCD and 0.85% for RAA.