CRBVX vs. RCS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CRBVX (Catholic Responsible Investments Bond Fund) and RCS (PIMCO Strategic Income Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 3 years, CRBVX returned 4.16%/yr vs 11.44%/yr for RCS. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CRBVX vs. RCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catholic Responsible Investments Bond Fund (CRBVX) and PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRBVX achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than RCS's 1.35% return.

CRBVX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 0.52%
• 6M: 0.36%
• 1Y: 5.29%
• 3Y*: 4.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RCS

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 1.35%
• 6M: -13.45%
• 1Y: -11.19%
• 3Y*: 11.44%
• 5Y*: 2.25%
• 10Y*: 3.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRBVX vs. RCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CRBVX Catholic Responsible Investments Bond Fund	0.52%	6.73%	1.94%	5.82%	-11.09%
RCS PIMCO Strategic Income Fund	1.35%	-21.48%	37.47%	37.60%	-13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between CRBVX and RCS is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022	0.22

The correlation between CRBVX and RCS shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CRBVX vs. RCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRBVX

CRBVX Risk / Return Rank: 28
CRBVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
CRBVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
CRBVX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
CRBVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
CRBVX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

RCS

RCS Risk / Return Rank: 1
RCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
RCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
RCS Omega Ratio Rank: 1
RCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
RCS Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRBVX vs. RCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catholic Responsible Investments Bond Fund (CRBVX) and PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRBVX	RCS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	-0.47	+1.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	-0.51	+2.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	0.93	+0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	-0.34	+2.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.31	-0.61	+6.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRBVX vs. RCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRBVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the RCS Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRBVX and RCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRBVX	RCS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.49	-0.47	+1.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.28	-0.17

Drawdowns

CRBVX vs. RCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRBVX drawdown since its inception was -15.00%, smaller than the maximum RCS drawdown of -46.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRBVX and RCS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRBVX	RCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.00%	-46.69%	+31.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.54%	-32.94%	+30.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.30%	-32.94%	+26.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-36.18%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.28%	-27.70%	+26.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.62%	-9.38%	+3.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	18.48%	-17.62%

Volatility

CRBVX vs. RCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Catholic Responsible Investments Bond Fund (CRBVX) is 1.26%, while PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that CRBVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRBVX	RCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.26%	7.20%	-5.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.50%	21.18%	-18.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.66%	23.98%	-20.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.06%	25.24%	-19.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.06%	25.83%	-19.77%

Dividends

CRBVX vs. RCS - Dividend Comparison

CRBVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than RCS's 8.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRBVX Catholic Responsible Investments Bond Fund	4.24%	4.25%	4.21%	3.93%	2.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RCS PIMCO Strategic Income Fund	8.81%	8.62%	8.03%	10.07%	12.39%	9.01%	9.57%	8.44%	8.93%	9.50%	10.92%	11.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRBVX and RCS in my portfolio?

CRBVX and RCS have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRBVX or RCS?

RCS has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to CRBVX (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRBVX dropped -15.00% vs RCS's -46.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRBVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.