PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CQTM vs. TSXU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CQTM vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CQTM

1D
-11.30%
1M
2.09%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSXU

1D
-19.03%
1M
9.50%
YTD
83.74%
6M
75.01%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CQTM vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CQTM and TSXU is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CQTM vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CQTM vs. TSXU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CQTMTSXUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

2.41

-2.13

Drawdowns

CQTM vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CQTM drawdown since its inception was -17.89%, smaller than the maximum TSXU drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQTM and TSXU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CQTMTSXUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.89%

-35.62%

+17.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.89%

-24.75%

+6.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-10.62%

+5.70%

Volatility

CQTM vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CQTMTSXUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

101.00%

82.24%

+18.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

101.00%

82.24%

+18.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

101.00%

82.24%

+18.76%

CQTM vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CQTM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

CQTM vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison

CQTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CQTM and TSXU have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CQTM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CQTM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.

TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.00% for CQTM.

CQTM is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Corgi Funds and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CQTM and 1.05% for TSXU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CQTM and TSXU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer