CQTM vs. SOXX
CQTM (Corgi Quantum Computing ETF) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CQTM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Corgi Funds, while SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index. CQTM is actively managed, while SOXX is passively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CQTM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SOXX.
Performance
CQTM vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CQTM
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- -5.87%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOXX
- 1D
- -5.64%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 96.11%
- 6M
- 92.98%
- 1Y
- 147.92%
- 3Y*
- 53.08%
- 5Y*
- 33.16%
- 10Y*
- 35.98%
CQTM vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CQTM Corgi Quantum Computing ETF | 8.30% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 22.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between CQTM and SOXX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CQTM vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank
CQTM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SOXX
CQTM vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CQTM | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.54 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 9.44 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 33.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CQTM vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CQTM drawdown since its inception was -20.27%, smaller than the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQTM and SOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CQTM | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.27% | -70.21% | +49.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -41.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.69% | -9.93% | -3.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.43% | -19.93% | +12.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.46% | — |
Volatility
CQTM vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CQTM | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 23.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.86% | 39.90% | +52.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 92.86% | 37.32% | +55.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.86% | 34.03% | +58.83% |
CQTM vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CQTM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
CQTM vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison
CQTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOXX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CQTM Corgi Quantum Computing ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.25% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CQTM and SOXX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CQTM.
SOXX has the higher dividend yield at 0.25%, compared with 0.00% for CQTM.
CQTM is categorized as Technology Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Corgi Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CQTM and 0.34% for SOXX.
Find the right allocation for CQTM and SOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer