CQTM vs. MOON

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

CQTM (Corgi Quantum Computing ETF) and MOON (Direxion Moonshot Innovators ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. CQTM is actively managed, while MOON is passively managed. CQTM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for MOON.

Performance

CQTM vs. MOON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM) and Direxion Moonshot Innovators ETF (MOON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CQTM

• 1D: -1.82%
• 1M: -5.87%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MOON

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CQTM vs. MOON - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CQTM Corgi Quantum Computing ETF	8.30%
MOON Direxion Moonshot Innovators ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

CQTM vs. MOON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM) and Direxion Moonshot Innovators ETF (MOON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CQTM	MOON	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.69%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.43%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CQTM	MOON	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.86%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	92.86%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	92.86%	—	—

CQTM vs. MOON - Expense Ratio Comparison

CQTM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MOON's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

CQTM vs. MOON - Dividend Comparison

Neither CQTM nor MOON has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2024	2023	2022	2021
CQTM Corgi Quantum Computing ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MOON Direxion Moonshot Innovators ETF	0.00%	0.62%	1.41%	0.00%	1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, CQTM or MOON?

On fees, CQTM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CQTM or MOON?

CQTM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for MOON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CQTM or MOON?

CQTM and MOON have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CQTM and MOON?

They also come from different issuers: Corgi Funds and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CQTM and 0.65% for MOON.