CQTM vs. FTXL
CQTM (Corgi Quantum Computing ETF) and FTXL (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CQTM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Corgi Funds, while FTXL is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. CQTM is actively managed, while FTXL is passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CQTM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXL.
Performance
CQTM vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CQTM
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTXL
- 1D
- -7.99%
- 1M
- 10.24%
- YTD
- 111.02%
- 6M
- 108.37%
- 1Y
- 198.66%
- 3Y*
- 59.97%
- 5Y*
- 33.38%
- 10Y*
- —
CQTM vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CQTM Corgi Quantum Computing ETF | 23.03% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 21.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between CQTM and FTXL is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CQTM vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank
CQTM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTXL
CQTM vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CQTM | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.63 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 13.78 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 47.69 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CQTM vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CQTM drawdown since its inception was -20.27%, smaller than the maximum FTXL drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQTM and FTXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CQTM | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.27% | -43.87% | +23.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -41.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | -7.99% | +6.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.05% | -10.53% | +3.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.18% | — |
Volatility
CQTM vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CQTM | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 22.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 93.76% | 40.91% | +52.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 93.76% | 37.11% | +56.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.76% | 34.77% | +58.99% |
CQTM vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CQTM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
CQTM vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison
CQTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CQTM Corgi Quantum Computing ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 0.13% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.89% | 0.25% | 0.48% | 0.92% | 0.71% | 0.47% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CQTM and FTXL have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CQTM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CQTM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXL.
FTXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for CQTM.
CQTM is categorized as Technology Equities, while FTXL is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Corgi Funds and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CQTM and 0.60% for FTXL.
Find the right allocation for CQTM and FTXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer