CQTM vs. AIS
CQTM (Corgi Quantum Computing ETF) and AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CQTM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AIS.
Performance
CQTM vs. AIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CQTM
- 1D
- -11.30%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIS
- 1D
- -11.74%
- 1M
- 7.09%
- YTD
- 87.53%
- 6M
- 88.58%
- 1Y
- 176.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CQTM vs. AIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CQTM Corgi Quantum Computing ETF | 2.09% |
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF | 7.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between CQTM and AIS is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CQTM vs. AIS — Risk / Return Rank
CQTM
AIS
CQTM vs. AIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CQTM | AIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 2.56 | -2.28 |
Drawdowns
CQTM vs. AIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CQTM drawdown since its inception was -17.89%, smaller than the maximum AIS drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQTM and AIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CQTM | AIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.89% | -32.78% | +14.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.89% | -14.22% | -3.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -5.46% | +0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.89% | — |
Volatility
CQTM vs. AIS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CQTM | AIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 20.94% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 32.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 101.00% | 38.13% | +62.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 101.00% | 39.29% | +61.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 101.00% | 39.29% | +61.71% |
CQTM vs. AIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CQTM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AIS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CQTM vs. AIS - Dividend Comparison
Neither CQTM nor AIS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CQTM and AIS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CQTM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CQTM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.
CQTM and AIS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Corgi Funds and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CQTM and 0.75% for AIS.
Find the right allocation for CQTM and AIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer