PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CQTM vs. AIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CQTM vs. AIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CQTM

1D
-11.30%
1M
2.09%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AIS

1D
-11.74%
1M
7.09%
YTD
87.53%
6M
88.58%
1Y
176.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CQTM vs. AIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CQTM and AIS is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026

0.61

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CQTM vs. AIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CQTM

AIS
AIS Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CQTM vs. AIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CQTM vs. AIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CQTMAISDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

2.56

-2.28

Drawdowns

CQTM vs. AIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CQTM drawdown since its inception was -17.89%, smaller than the maximum AIS drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQTM and AIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CQTMAISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.89%

-32.78%

+14.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.89%

-14.22%

-3.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-5.46%

+0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.89%

Volatility

CQTM vs. AIS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CQTMAISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

101.00%

38.13%

+62.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

101.00%

39.29%

+61.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

101.00%

39.29%

+61.71%

CQTM vs. AIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CQTM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AIS's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CQTM vs. AIS - Dividend Comparison

Neither CQTM nor AIS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CQTM and AIS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CQTM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CQTM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.

CQTM and AIS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Corgi Funds and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CQTM and 0.75% for AIS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CQTM and AIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer