PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CQQQ vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CQQQ vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CQQQ achieves a 2.46% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, CQQQ has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 5.40%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.94% annualized return.


CQQQ

1D
-1.50%
1M
4.43%
YTD
2.46%
6M
5.43%
1Y
32.76%
3Y*
10.55%
5Y*
-7.50%
10Y*
5.40%

QQQ

1D
-0.26%
1M
10.60%
YTD
21.30%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CQQQ vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
2.46%34.96%9.84%-16.71%-30.09%-24.54%57.33%33.57%-34.77%74.31%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.30%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between CQQQ and QQQ is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2009

0.57

The correlation between CQQQ and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CQQQ vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CQQQ
QQQ

Technology

58.2%
53.8%

Communication Services

21.9%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

13.8%
12.3%

Industrials

1.3%
2.8%

Financial Services

0.1%
0.2%

Basic Materials

0.1%
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Technology

CQQQ
58.2%
QQQ
53.8%

Communication Services

CQQQ
21.9%
QQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

CQQQ
13.8%
QQQ
12.3%

Industrials

CQQQ
1.3%
QQQ
2.8%

Financial Services

CQQQ
0.1%
QQQ
0.2%

Basic Materials

CQQQ
0.1%
QQQ
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

CQQQ

-

QQQ
7.7%

Energy

CQQQ

-

QQQ
0.6%

Healthcare

CQQQ

-

QQQ
4.2%

Real Estate

CQQQ

-

QQQ
0.1%

Utilities

CQQQ

-

QQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CQQQ vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CQQQ
CQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
CQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
CQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CQQQ vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CQQQQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.45

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

3.51

-2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.16

13.49

-10.33

CQQQ vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CQQQ and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CQQQQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

2.64

-1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

0.81

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.99

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.41

-0.22

Drawdowns

CQQQ vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CQQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.99%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQQQ and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CQQQQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.99%

-82.97%

+8.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.41%

-11.96%

-12.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.93%

-22.77%

-13.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.96%

-35.12%

-31.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.99%

-35.12%

-38.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.18%

-0.26%

-48.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.29%

-32.79%

+4.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.39%

3.11%

+7.28%

Volatility

CQQQ vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has a higher volatility of 11.60% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that CQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CQQQQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.60%

4.49%

+7.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.88%

12.10%

+9.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.78%

15.94%

+13.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.02%

22.38%

+15.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.30%

22.29%

+11.01%

CQQQ vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CQQQ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

CQQQ vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

CQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
2.11%2.17%0.28%0.55%0.08%0.00%0.47%0.01%0.43%1.41%1.69%1.77%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


CQQQ and QQQ have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CQQQ has higher volatility (11.60%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CQQQ dropped -73.99% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.94% vs 5.40% for CQQQ. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.94% return vs 5.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CQQQ.

CQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

CQQQ is categorized as China Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. CQQQ tracks AlphaShares China Technology Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CQQQ and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CQQQ and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer