PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CQQQ vs. FCA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CQQQ vs. FCA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CQQQ vs. FCA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
-11.50%34.96%9.84%-16.71%-30.09%-24.54%57.33%33.57%-34.77%74.31%
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
10.86%45.20%14.07%-8.28%-17.61%-0.65%11.80%18.72%-18.30%60.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CQQQ achieves a -11.50% return, which is significantly lower than FCA's 10.86% return. Over the past 10 years, CQQQ has underperformed FCA with an annualized return of 3.76%, while FCA has yielded a comparatively higher 9.40% annualized return.


CQQQ

1D
2.91%
1M
-11.62%
YTD
-11.50%
6M
-20.29%
1Y
6.15%
3Y*
0.59%
5Y*
-10.73%
10Y*
3.76%

FCA

1D
-0.29%
1M
-7.82%
YTD
10.86%
6M
8.68%
1Y
53.93%
3Y*
17.99%
5Y*
5.95%
10Y*
9.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CQQQ vs. FCA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CQQQ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than FCA's 0.80% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CQQQ vs. FCA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CQQQ
CQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
CQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
CQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
CQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
CQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

FCA
FCA Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCA Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCA Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CQQQ vs. FCA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CQQQFCADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.19

2.07

-1.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.51

2.56

-2.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.38

-0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

3.34

-3.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.63

15.08

-14.45

CQQQ vs. FCA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the FCA Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CQQQ and FCA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CQQQFCADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

2.07

-1.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

0.22

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

0.36

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.13

+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between CQQQ and FCA is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CQQQ vs. FCA - Dividend Comparison

CQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than FCA's 2.32% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
2.45%2.17%0.28%0.55%0.08%0.00%0.47%0.01%0.43%1.41%1.69%1.77%
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
2.32%2.67%5.17%5.70%6.00%4.91%4.12%3.73%3.10%2.30%2.51%4.13%

Drawdowns

CQQQ vs. FCA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CQQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.99%, which is greater than FCA's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQQQ and FCA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CQQQFCADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.99%

-45.56%

-28.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.41%

-15.81%

-8.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.04%

-42.47%

-24.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.99%

-42.47%

-31.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.10%

-8.75%

-47.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.04%

-21.81%

-6.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.99%

3.50%

+5.49%

Volatility

CQQQ vs. FCA - Volatility Comparison

Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has a higher volatility of 10.60% compared to First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) at 8.25%. This indicates that CQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CQQQFCADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.60%

8.25%

+2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.75%

16.57%

+4.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.95%

26.19%

+5.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.72%

27.43%

+10.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.06%

26.57%

+6.49%