PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CQQQ vs. DRGN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CQQQ vs. DRGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CQQQ achieves a 2.46% return, which is significantly lower than DRGN's 16.56% return.


CQQQ

1D
-1.50%
1M
4.43%
YTD
2.46%
6M
5.43%
1Y
32.76%
3Y*
10.55%
5Y*
-7.50%
10Y*
5.40%

DRGN

1D
0.42%
1M
5.53%
YTD
16.56%
6M
18.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CQQQ vs. DRGN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CQQQ and DRGN is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025

0.87

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CQQQ vs. DRGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CQQQ
CQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
CQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
CQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

DRGN
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CQQQ vs. DRGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CQQQDRGNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.16

CQQQ vs. DRGN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CQQQDRGNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

1.58

-1.39

Drawdowns

CQQQ vs. DRGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CQQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.99%, which is greater than DRGN's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQQQ and DRGN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CQQQDRGNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.99%

-20.86%

-53.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.18%

-7.05%

-42.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.29%

-7.93%

-20.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.39%

Volatility

CQQQ vs. DRGN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CQQQDRGNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.78%

34.85%

-5.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.02%

34.85%

+3.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.30%

34.85%

-1.55%

CQQQ vs. DRGN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CQQQ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than DRGN's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

CQQQ vs. DRGN - Dividend Comparison

CQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, more than DRGN's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
2.11%2.17%0.28%0.55%0.08%0.00%0.47%0.01%0.43%1.41%1.69%1.77%
DRGN
Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF
1.04%1.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CQQQ and DRGN have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DRGN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRGN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CQQQ.

CQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 1.04% for DRGN.

CQQQ is categorized as China Equities, while DRGN is Technology Equities. CQQQ tracks AlphaShares China Technology Index, while DRGN tracks BITA China Generative AI Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CQQQ and 0.39% for DRGN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CQQQ and DRGN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer