CPXR vs. UMI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CPXR (USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF) and UMI (USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CPXR is a Copper fund tracking the SummerHaven Copper Index, while UMI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by USCF. CPXR is passively managed, while UMI is actively managed. Over the past year, CPXR returned 83.67% vs 28.25% for UMI. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CPXR charges 1.20%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UMI.

Performance

CPXR vs. UMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPXR achieves a 20.21% return, which is significantly lower than UMI's 26.70% return.

CPXR

• 1D: 1.31%
• 1M: 11.94%
• 6M: 12.04%
• YTD: 20.21%
• 1Y: 83.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 37.96%

UMI

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 3.72%
• 6M: 18.07%
• YTD: 26.70%
• 1Y: 28.25%
• 3Y*: 26.23%
• 5Y*: 22.50%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CPXR USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF	$409.02K	$351.97K	$733.40K
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF	$1.28M	$1.03M	$1.15M

CPXR vs. UMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CPXR USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF	20.21%	35.65%
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF	26.70%	-4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between CPXR and UMI is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2025	0.14

The correlation between CPXR and UMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CPXR vs. UMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CPXR

CPXR Risk / Return Rank: 66
CPXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
CPXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
CPXR Omega Ratio Rank: 63
CPXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
CPXR Martin Ratio Rank: 65

UMI

UMI Risk / Return Rank: 83
UMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
UMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
UMI Omega Ratio Rank: 81
UMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
UMI Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CPXR vs. UMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CPXR	UMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	1.95	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	2.69	-0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.34	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.71	3.79	-1.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.86	9.51	-1.65

CPXR vs. UMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPXR Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the UMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPXR and UMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CPXR vs. UMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPXR drawdown since its inception was -47.87%, roughly equal to the maximum UMI drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPXR and UMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPXR	UMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.87%	-48.08%	+0.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.64%	-7.50%	-24.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.08%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.19%	-2.00%	-4.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.96%	-6.53%	-12.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.90%	2.98%	+7.92%

Volatility

CPXR vs. UMI - Volatility Comparison

USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR) has a higher volatility of 12.08% compared to USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) at 5.19%. This indicates that CPXR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPXR	UMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.08%	5.19%	+6.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.09%	11.67%	+30.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.10%	14.59%	+41.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	66.91%	19.35%	+47.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.91%	23.10%	+43.81%

CPXR vs. UMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPXR has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than UMI's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

CPXR vs. UMI - Dividend Comparison

CPXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than UMI's 5.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CPXR USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF	0.58%	0.70%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF	5.80%	6.23%	4.39%	4.67%	4.36%	3.00%	2.18%	2.47%	2.48%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPXR and UMI in my portfolio?

CPXR and UMI have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CPXR or UMI?

CPXR has higher volatility (12.08%) compared to UMI (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPXR dropped -47.87% vs UMI's -48.08%.

Which ETF is better, CPXR or UMI?

On 1-year performance, CPXR leads with 83.67% vs 28.25% for UMI. On fees, UMI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, UMI has been the lower-risk option at 5.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CPXR or UMI?

Over the 1-year period, CPXR has performed better with a 83.67% return vs 28.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CPXR or UMI?

UMI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.20% for CPXR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CPXR or UMI?

UMI has the higher dividend yield at 5.80%, compared with 0.58% for CPXR.

What is the main difference between CPXR and UMI?

CPXR is categorized as Copper, while UMI is Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.20% for CPXR and 0.85% for UMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.