PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPXR vs. YGLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPXR vs. YGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR) and Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF (YGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPXR achieves a 21.61% return, which is significantly higher than YGLD's -7.24% return.


CPXR

1D
-5.10%
1M
21.98%
YTD
21.61%
6M
34.31%
1Y
37.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YGLD

1D
-1.34%
1M
-2.29%
YTD
-7.24%
6M
-7.14%
1Y
23.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPXR vs. YGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CPXR and YGLD is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPXR vs. YGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPXR
CPXR Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
CPXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPXR Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
CPXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPXR Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

YGLD
YGLD Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
YGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
YGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
YGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
YGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPXR vs. YGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR) and Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF (YGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPXRYGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.14

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

0.68

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.47

1.55

-0.09

CPXR vs. YGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPXR Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is comparable to the YGLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPXR and YGLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPXRYGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

0.57

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

1.17

-0.52

Drawdowns

CPXR vs. YGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPXR drawdown since its inception was -47.87%, which is greater than YGLD's maximum drawdown of -34.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPXR and YGLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPXRYGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.87%

-34.23%

-13.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.87%

-34.23%

-13.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.10%

-33.06%

+27.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.88%

-7.91%

-11.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.94%

14.86%

+11.08%

Volatility

CPXR vs. YGLD - Volatility Comparison

USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR) has a higher volatility of 18.75% compared to Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF (YGLD) at 8.70%. This indicates that CPXR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPXRYGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.75%

8.70%

+10.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.26%

34.68%

+10.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.77%

40.43%

+28.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.61%

39.10%

+29.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.61%

39.10%

+29.51%

CPXR vs. YGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPXR has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than YGLD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPXR vs. YGLD - Dividend Comparison

CPXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than YGLD's 19.23% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CPXR and YGLD have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CPXR has higher volatility (18.75%) compared to YGLD (8.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPXR dropped -47.87% vs YGLD's -34.23%.

On 1-year performance, CPXR leads with 37.97% vs 23.02% for YGLD. On fees, YGLD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, YGLD has been the lower-risk option at 8.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CPXR has performed better with a 37.97% return vs 23.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

YGLD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.20% for CPXR.

YGLD has the higher dividend yield at 19.23%, compared with 0.58% for CPXR.

CPXR is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while YGLD is Gold. They also come from different issuers: USCF and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 1.20% for CPXR and 0.50% for YGLD.

YGLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPXR and YGLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer