PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPXR vs. SLVU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPXR vs. SLVU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR) and BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CPXR is traded in USD, while SLVU.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the SLVU.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPXR achieves a 21.61% return, which is significantly higher than SLVU.TO's -33.67% return.


CPXR

1D
-5.10%
1M
21.98%
YTD
21.61%
6M
34.31%
1Y
37.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SLVU.TO

1D
-5.74%
1M
-4.05%
YTD
-33.67%
6M
-7.21%
1Y
130.38%
3Y*
48.07%
5Y*
9.01%
10Y*
6.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPXR vs. SLVU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CPXR
USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF
21.61%36.03%
SLVU.TO
BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF
-33.67%311.36%

Correlation

The correlation between CPXR and SLVU.TO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025

0.52

The correlation between CPXR and SLVU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPXR vs. SLVU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPXR
CPXR Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
CPXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPXR Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
CPXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPXR Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

SLVU.TO
SLVU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SLVU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPXR vs. SLVU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR) and BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPXRSLVU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.31

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

1.70

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.47

3.23

-1.77

CPXR vs. SLVU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPXR Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the SLVU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPXR and SLVU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPXRSLVU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

1.10

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

-0.03

+0.68

Drawdowns

CPXR vs. SLVU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPXR drawdown since its inception was -47.87%, smaller than the maximum SLVU.TO drawdown of -99.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPXR and SLVU.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPXRSLVU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.87%

-99.08%

+51.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.87%

-77.20%

+29.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.10%

-93.59%

+88.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.88%

-83.62%

+63.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.94%

40.48%

-14.54%

Volatility

CPXR vs. SLVU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR) is 18.75%, while BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO) has a volatility of 34.36%. This indicates that CPXR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPXRSLVU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.75%

34.36%

-15.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.26%

133.69%

-88.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.77%

119.52%

-50.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.61%

76.27%

-7.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.61%

68.08%

+0.53%

CPXR vs. SLVU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPXR has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVU.TO's 2.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPXR vs. SLVU.TO - Dividend Comparison

CPXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, while SLVU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
CPXR
USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF
0.58%0.70%
SLVU.TO
BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CPXR and SLVU.TO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CPXR is cheaper at 1.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CPXR is cheaper with a 1.20% expense ratio, compared with 2.20% for SLVU.TO.

CPXR is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while SLVU.TO is Silver. CPXR tracks SummerHaven Copper Index, while SLVU.TO tracks Solactive Silver Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER. They also come from different issuers: USCF and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.20% for CPXR and 2.20% for SLVU.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPXR and SLVU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer