CPXJ.AS vs. QTOP
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (CPXJ.AS) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP).
CPXJ.AS and QTOP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CPXJ.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. It was launched on Jan 12, 2010. QTOP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index. It was launched on Oct 23, 2024. Both CPXJ.AS and QTOP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CPXJ.AS vs. QTOP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CPXJ.AS vs. QTOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CPXJ.AS iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF | 7.49% | 6.69% | -0.73% |
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | -3.00% | 7.69% | 10.67% |
Different Trading Currencies
CPXJ.AS is traded in EUR, while QTOP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QTOP values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPXJ.AS achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly higher than QTOP's -3.45% return.
CPXJ.AS
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- 7.49%
- 6M
- 6.82%
- 1Y
- 17.09%
- 3Y*
- 8.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.04%
- 10Y*
- 7.70%
QTOP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.69%
- YTD
- -3.45%
- 6M
- -1.44%
- 1Y
- 18.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CPXJ.AS vs. QTOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CPXJ.AS and QTOP have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
CPXJ.AS vs. QTOP — Risk / Return Rank
CPXJ.AS
QTOP
CPXJ.AS vs. QTOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (CPXJ.AS) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CPXJ.AS | QTOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 0.72 | +0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.44 | 1.15 | +0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.17 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.72 | 1.29 | +4.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.64 | 4.04 | +13.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CPXJ.AS | QTOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 0.72 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.42 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between CPXJ.AS and QTOP is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CPXJ.AS vs. QTOP - Dividend Comparison
CPXJ.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CPXJ.AS iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | 0.41% | 0.38% | 0.11% |
Drawdowns
CPXJ.AS vs. QTOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPXJ.AS drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, which is greater than QTOP's maximum drawdown of -27.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPXJ.AS and QTOP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPXJ.AS | QTOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.83% | -23.28% | -13.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.59% | -12.88% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.65% | -8.17% | +4.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.72% | -4.13% | -2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 3.81% | -1.80% |
Volatility
CPXJ.AS vs. QTOP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (CPXJ.AS) is 4.51%, while iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) has a volatility of 6.12%. This indicates that CPXJ.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CPXJ.AS | QTOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 6.12% | -1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.59% | 14.09% | -5.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.69% | 25.61% | -9.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.59% | 24.92% | -10.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 24.92% | -8.40% |