CPXJ.AS vs. DFND.AS

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (CPXJ.AS) and iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF (DFND.AS).

CPXJ.AS and DFND.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CPXJ.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. It was launched on Jan 12, 2010. DFND.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Developed BMI Select Aerospace & Defense 35/20 Capped Index NR. It was launched on Feb 1, 2024. Both CPXJ.AS and DFND.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CPXJ.AS vs. DFND.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (CPXJ.AS) and iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF (DFND.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CPXJ.AS vs. DFND.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CPXJ.AS iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF	7.49%	6.69%	11.91%
DFND.AS iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	19.34%

Different Trading Currencies

CPXJ.AS is traded in EUR, while DFND.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DFND.AS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

CPXJ.AS

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -1.11%
• YTD: 7.49%
• 6M: 6.82%
• 1Y: 17.09%
• 3Y*: 8.80%
• 5Y*: 6.04%
• 10Y*: 7.70%

DFND.AS

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPXJ.AS vs. DFND.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPXJ.AS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND.AS's 0.35% expense ratio.

DFND.AS

iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF

CPXJ.AS

iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

CPXJ.AS vs. DFND.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPXJ.AS

CPXJ.AS Risk / Return Rank: 72
CPXJ.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
CPXJ.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
CPXJ.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 59
CPXJ.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CPXJ.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPXJ.AS vs. DFND.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (CPXJ.AS) and iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF (DFND.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CPXJ.AS	DFND.AS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.72	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.64	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CPXJ.AS	DFND.AS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between CPXJ.AS and DFND.AS is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CPXJ.AS vs. DFND.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither CPXJ.AS nor DFND.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CPXJ.AS	DFND.AS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.65%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.72%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CPXJ.AS	DFND.AS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.59%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.69%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.59%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.52%	—	—