CPXJ.AS vs. VEUA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (CPXJ.AS) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating (VEUA.L).
CPXJ.AS and VEUA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CPXJ.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. It was launched on Jan 12, 2010. VEUA.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on Jul 23, 2019. Both CPXJ.AS and VEUA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CPXJ.AS or VEUA.L.
Correlation
The correlation between CPXJ.AS and VEUA.L is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CPXJ.AS vs. VEUA.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CPXJ.AS:
1.49
VEUA.L:
1.25
CPXJ.AS:
2.12
VEUA.L:
1.79
CPXJ.AS:
1.26
VEUA.L:
1.21
CPXJ.AS:
2.01
VEUA.L:
1.98
CPXJ.AS:
7.75
VEUA.L:
4.47
CPXJ.AS:
2.46%
VEUA.L:
2.88%
CPXJ.AS:
12.94%
VEUA.L:
10.29%
CPXJ.AS:
-36.83%
VEUA.L:
-28.45%
CPXJ.AS:
-1.50%
VEUA.L:
-0.60%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPXJ.AS achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly lower than VEUA.L's 7.57% return.
CPXJ.AS
3.65%
1.90%
14.19%
18.25%
5.04%
5.20%
VEUA.L
7.57%
5.59%
6.95%
12.84%
7.68%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CPXJ.AS vs. VEUA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPXJ.AS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VEUA.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CPXJ.AS vs. VEUA.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CPXJ.AS
VEUA.L
CPXJ.AS vs. VEUA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (CPXJ.AS) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating (VEUA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CPXJ.AS vs. VEUA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CPXJ.AS nor VEUA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CPXJ.AS vs. VEUA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPXJ.AS drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, which is greater than VEUA.L's maximum drawdown of -28.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPXJ.AS and VEUA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CPXJ.AS vs. VEUA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (CPXJ.AS) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating (VEUA.L) at 3.61%. This indicates that CPXJ.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEUA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.