PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPT vs. MTSFY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CPT vs. MTSFY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Camden Property Trust (CPT) and Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR (MTSFY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPT achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly higher than MTSFY's -18.54% return.


CPT

1D
0.33%
1M
8.87%
YTD
3.75%
6M
12.33%
1Y
1.52%
3Y*
3.86%
5Y*
0.18%
10Y*
7.55%

MTSFY

1D
1.35%
1M
-12.94%
YTD
-18.54%
6M
-19.49%
1Y
-2.62%
3Y*
12.12%
5Y*
3.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPT vs. MTSFY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CPT
Camden Property Trust
3.75%-1.48%21.31%-7.64%-35.58%83.40%-2.28%24.21%12.70%
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR
-18.54%43.82%-0.71%34.87%-7.78%-8.75%-11.04%11.36%4.33%

Correlation

The correlation between CPT and MTSFY is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018

0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CPT:

$11.85B

MTSFY:

$25.18B

EPS

CPT:

$3.60

MTSFY:

$306.23

PE Ratio

CPT:

31.40

MTSFY:

0.09

PEG Ratio

CPT:

0.88

MTSFY:

0.01

PS Ratio

CPT:

10.30

MTSFY:

0.01

PB Ratio

CPT:

2.94

MTSFY:

0.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

CPT:

$1.18B

MTSFY:

$2.74T

Gross Profit (TTM)

CPT:

$725.73M

MTSFY:

$604.28B

EBITDA (TTM)

CPT:

$1.12B

MTSFY:

$547.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPT vs. MTSFY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPT
CPT Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
CPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPT Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPT Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

MTSFY
MTSFY Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MTSFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTSFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTSFY Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
MTSFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTSFY Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPT vs. MTSFY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camden Property Trust (CPT) and Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR (MTSFY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPTMTSFYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.01

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

-0.08

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.18

-0.20

+0.38

CPT vs. MTSFY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPT Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is higher than the MTSFY Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPT and MTSFY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPTMTSFYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

-0.08

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.10

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.12

+0.27

Drawdowns

CPT vs. MTSFY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPT drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, which is greater than MTSFY's maximum drawdown of -52.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPT and MTSFY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPTMTSFYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.31%

-52.08%

-23.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.05%

-34.56%

+18.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.87%

-34.56%

+9.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.22%

-34.56%

-15.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.22%

-33.68%

+7.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.91%

-19.93%

+7.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.58%

12.95%

-4.37%

Volatility

CPT vs. MTSFY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Camden Property Trust (CPT) is 5.21%, while Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR (MTSFY) has a volatility of 13.86%. This indicates that CPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTSFY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPTMTSFYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

13.86%

-8.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.28%

24.57%

-10.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.39%

31.22%

-11.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.69%

29.63%

-6.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.37%

33.72%

-9.35%

Dividends

CPT vs. MTSFY - Dividend Comparison

CPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, while MTSFY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPT
Camden Property Trust
3.73%3.82%3.55%4.03%3.36%1.93%3.32%3.02%3.50%3.26%8.62%3.65%
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR
0.00%0.98%1.26%0.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CPT vs. MTSFY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Camden Property Trust and Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00B400.00B600.00B800.00B1.00T202220232024202520260
741.27B
(CPT) Total Revenue
(MTSFY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CPT and MTSFY have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTSFY has higher volatility (13.86%) compared to CPT (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPT dropped -75.31% vs MTSFY's -52.08%.

CPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.08 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPT and MTSFY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer