CPSD vs. SPYV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CPSD (Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December) and SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CPSD is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos, while SPYV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value. CPSD is actively managed, while SPYV is passively managed. Over the past year, CPSD returned 9.16% vs 21.26% for SPYV. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CPSD charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYV.

Performance

CPSD vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December (CPSD) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPSD achieves a 2.55% return, which is significantly lower than SPYV's 7.46% return.

CPSD

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: 2.55%
• 6M: 2.99%
• 1Y: 9.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPYV

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 2.22%
• YTD: 7.46%
• 6M: 7.77%
• 1Y: 21.26%
• 3Y*: 15.72%
• 5Y*: 10.68%
• 10Y*: 11.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPSD vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CPSD Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December	2.55%	7.63%	0.04%
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF	7.46%	13.18%	-6.22%

Correlation

The correlation between CPSD and SPYV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2024	0.65

The correlation between CPSD and SPYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CPSD vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPSD

CPSD Risk / Return Rank: 94
CPSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
CPSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CPSD Omega Ratio Rank: 95
CPSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CPSD Martin Ratio Rank: 95

SPYV

SPYV Risk / Return Rank: 66
SPYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
SPYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
SPYV Omega Ratio Rank: 63
SPYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
SPYV Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPSD vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December (CPSD) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CPSD	SPYV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.26	2.17	+1.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.18	3.05	+2.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.72	1.39	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.19	3.43	+2.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	30.66	13.16	+17.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CPSD vs. SPYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPSD Sharpe Ratio is 3.26, which is higher than the SPYV Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPSD and SPYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CPSD	SPYV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.26	2.17	+1.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.03	0.42	+1.60

Drawdowns

CPSD vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPSD drawdown since its inception was -3.45%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPSD and SPYV.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPSD	SPYV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.45%	-58.45%	+55.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.49%	-6.22%	+4.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.54%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.89%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.57%	+0.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.47%	-8.72%	+8.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.30%	1.62%	-1.32%

Volatility

CPSD vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December (CPSD) is 0.37%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) has a volatility of 1.98%. This indicates that CPSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPSD	SPYV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.37%	1.98%	-1.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.58%	7.04%	-5.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.83%	9.84%	-7.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.41%	14.40%	-10.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.41%	16.94%	-13.53%

CPSD vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPSD has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

CPSD vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison

CPSD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CPSD Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF	1.70%	1.77%	2.29%	1.75%	2.22%	2.10%	2.38%	2.25%	2.97%	2.77%	2.39%	2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPSD and SPYV in my portfolio?

CPSD and SPYV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CPSD or SPYV?

SPYV has higher volatility (1.98%) compared to CPSD (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPSD dropped -3.45% vs SPYV's -58.45%.

Which ETF is better, CPSD or SPYV?

On 1-year performance, SPYV leads with 21.26% vs 9.16% for CPSD. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, CPSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CPSD or SPYV?

Over the 1-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 21.26% return vs 9.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CPSD or SPYV?

SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CPSD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CPSD or SPYV?

SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.00% for CPSD.

What is the main difference between CPSD and SPYV?

CPSD is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SPYV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CPSD and 0.04% for SPYV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CPSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.