PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPRY vs. MSTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPRY vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CPRY) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPRY achieves a 3.87% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -26.97% return.


CPRY

1D
0.18%
1M
0.74%
6M
3.13%
YTD
3.87%
1Y
11.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTZ

1D
-1.53%
1M
30.47%
6M
-19.19%
YTD
-26.97%
1Y
264.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPRY vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CPRY and MSTZ is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025

-0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPRY vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPRY
CPRY Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CPRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPRY Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CPRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPRY Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTZ
MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPRY vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CPRY) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CPRYMSTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.30

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.42

2.86

+1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.69

5.59

+17.10

CPRY vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPRY Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPRY and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CPRY vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPRY drawdown since its inception was -3.23%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPRY and MSTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPRYMSTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.23%

-99.38%

+96.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.48%

-84.89%

+82.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-97.51%

+97.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.64%

-94.53%

+93.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

43.41%

-42.93%

Volatility

CPRY vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CPRY) is 0.57%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.46%. This indicates that CPRY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPRYMSTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.57%

56.46%

-55.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.93%

135.20%

-133.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.46%

148.41%

-143.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.26%

171.17%

-166.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.26%

171.17%

-166.91%

CPRY vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPRY has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPRY vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither CPRY nor MSTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CPRY and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTZ has higher volatility (56.46%) compared to CPRY (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPRY dropped -3.23% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 264.10% vs 11.17% for CPRY. On fees, CPRY is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CPRY has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 264.10% return vs 11.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CPRY is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

CPRY and MSTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

CPRY is categorized as Defined Outcome, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CPRY and 1.05% for MSTZ.

CPRY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPRY and MSTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer