CPJ1.L vs. XKS2.L
CPJ1.L (iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc) and XKS2.L (Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - CPJ1.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD while XKS2.L tracks the MSCI Korea NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CPJ1.L returned 8.53%/yr vs 17.87%/yr for XKS2.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CPJ1.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for XKS2.L.
Performance
CPJ1.L vs. XKS2.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPJ1.L achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly lower than XKS2.L's 107.22% return. Over the past 10 years, CPJ1.L has underperformed XKS2.L with an annualized return of 8.53%, while XKS2.L has yielded a comparatively higher 17.87% annualized return.
CPJ1.L
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 8.83%
- 6M
- 9.62%
- 1Y
- 17.48%
- 3Y*
- 10.56%
- 5Y*
- 6.01%
- 10Y*
- 8.53%
XKS2.L
- 1D
- -4.89%
- 1M
- 17.08%
- YTD
- 107.22%
- 6M
- 125.61%
- 1Y
- 237.24%
- 3Y*
- 45.20%
- 5Y*
- 19.87%
- 10Y*
- 17.87%
CPJ1.L vs. XKS2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPJ1.L iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc | 8.83% | 12.05% | 6.89% | 0.15% | 4.86% | 5.71% | 3.46% | 14.30% | -5.53% | 15.18% |
XKS2.L Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C | 107.22% | 85.79% | -21.66% | 13.44% | -19.57% | -7.21% | 38.65% | 7.36% | -16.54% | 32.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPJ1.L and XKS2.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2011 | 0.57 |
The correlation between CPJ1.L and XKS2.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.62 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CPJ1.L vs. XKS2.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CPJ1.L
XKS2.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Technology
Financial Services
CPJ1.L
XKS2.L
Basic Materials
CPJ1.L
XKS2.L
Industrials
CPJ1.L
XKS2.L
Real Estate
CPJ1.L
XKS2.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
CPJ1.L
XKS2.L
Utilities
CPJ1.L
XKS2.L
Healthcare
CPJ1.L
XKS2.L
Consumer Defensive
CPJ1.L
XKS2.L
Communication Services
CPJ1.L
XKS2.L
Energy
CPJ1.L
XKS2.L
Technology
CPJ1.L
XKS2.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPJ1.L vs. XKS2.L — Risk / Return Rank
CPJ1.L
XKS2.L
CPJ1.L vs. XKS2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (XKS2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CPJ1.L | XKS2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.85 | -0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 11.05 | -8.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.27 | 39.18 | -31.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CPJ1.L | XKS2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 6.41 | -4.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.79 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.73 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.38 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
CPJ1.L vs. XKS2.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPJ1.L drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, smaller than the maximum XKS2.L drawdown of -62.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPJ1.L and XKS2.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPJ1.L | XKS2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.49% | -62.63% | +30.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.23% | -21.33% | +14.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.15% | -28.70% | +11.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.61% | -40.70% | +23.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.49% | -44.01% | +11.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.97% | -5.27% | +2.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.90% | -15.75% | +8.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 6.03% | -3.63% |
Volatility
CPJ1.L vs. XKS2.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) is 3.70%, while Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (XKS2.L) has a volatility of 17.29%. This indicates that CPJ1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XKS2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPJ1.L | XKS2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 17.29% | -13.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.65% | 32.10% | -23.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.99% | 36.79% | -25.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.74% | 25.17% | -11.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.93% | 24.35% | -8.42% |
CPJ1.L vs. XKS2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPJ1.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XKS2.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CPJ1.L vs. XKS2.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CPJ1.L nor XKS2.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CPJ1.L and XKS2.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CPJ1.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CPJ1.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XKS2.L.
CPJ1.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while XKS2.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CPJ1.L and 0.65% for XKS2.L.
Find the right allocation for CPJ1.L and XKS2.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer