PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CPJ1.L vs. RQFI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CPJ1.L vs. RQFI.L

Last updated Jul 17, 2026
Documentation

CPJ1.L (iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc) and RQFI.L (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - CPJ1.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while RQFI.L is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CPJ1.L returned 7.36%/yr vs 4.75%/yr for RQFI.L. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CPJ1.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for RQFI.L.

Performance

CPJ1.L vs. RQFI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPJ1.L achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly higher than RQFI.L's 4.78% return. Over the past 10 years, CPJ1.L has outperformed RQFI.L with an annualized return of 7.36%, while RQFI.L has yielded a comparatively lower 4.75% annualized return.

CPJ1.L

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.98%
6M
7.32%
YTD
10.58%
1Y
16.07%
3Y*
11.78%
5Y*
6.51%
10Y*
7.36%

RQFI.L

1D
-1.87%
1M
-4.29%
6M
1.06%
YTD
4.78%
1Y
26.16%
3Y*
9.45%
5Y*
-0.48%
10Y*
4.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPJ1.L vs. RQFI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CPJ1.L
iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc		10.58%12.05%6.89%0.15%4.86%5.71%3.46%14.30%-5.53%15.18%
RQFI.L
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D		4.78%18.47%15.24%-18.06%-18.37%-0.46%33.54%29.73%-23.62%20.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CPJ1.L and RQFI.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2014

0.47

The correlation between CPJ1.L and RQFI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.48 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CPJ1.L vs. RQFI.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CPJ1.L
RQFI.L

Financial Services

45.1%
20.4%

Basic Materials

15.8%
10.7%

Industrials

8.7%
16.6%

Real Estate

7.2%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
6.7%

Healthcare

3.8%
4.9%

Utilities

3.5%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
7.4%

Communication Services

2.6%
0.8%

Energy

2.5%
2.8%

Technology

1.0%
26.3%

Financial Services

CPJ1.L
45.1%
RQFI.L
20.4%

Basic Materials

CPJ1.L
15.8%
RQFI.L
10.7%

Industrials

CPJ1.L
8.7%
RQFI.L
16.6%

Real Estate

CPJ1.L
7.2%
RQFI.L
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

CPJ1.L
6.9%
RQFI.L
6.7%

Healthcare

CPJ1.L
3.8%
RQFI.L
4.9%

Utilities

CPJ1.L
3.5%
RQFI.L
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

CPJ1.L
3.2%
RQFI.L
7.4%

Communication Services

CPJ1.L
2.6%
RQFI.L
0.8%

Energy

CPJ1.L
2.5%
RQFI.L
2.8%

Technology

CPJ1.L
1.0%
RQFI.L
26.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D

Often compared with CPJ1.L:
CPJ1.L vs. AGES.LCPJ1.L vs. ETLK.DECPJ1.L vs. CUKX.LCPJ1.L vs. IUKD.LCPJ1.L vs. LGAG.LCPJ1.L vs. VUKE.LCPJ1.L vs. PADV.L
Often compared with RQFI.L:
RQFI.L vs. CA3S.LRQFI.L vs. CHIN.LRQFI.L vs. XCX6.LRQFI.L vs. HMCT.LRQFI.L vs. CEBG.LRQFI.L vs. CM5S.LRQFI.L vs. XCNA.L

Return for Risk

CPJ1.L vs. RQFI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CPJ1.L
CPJ1.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
CPJ1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
RQFI.L
RQFI.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
RQFI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RQFI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
RQFI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
RQFI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
RQFI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPJ1.L vs. RQFI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

CPJ1.LRQFI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.41
1.54

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.10
2.13

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.27

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

3.05

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.01

9.68

-3.67

CPJ1.L vs. RQFI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPJ1.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the RQFI.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPJ1.L and RQFI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CPJ1.L vs. RQFI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPJ1.L drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, smaller than the maximum RQFI.L drawdown of -47.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPJ1.L and RQFI.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CPJ1.LRQFI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.49%

-47.55%

+15.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-8.53%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.21%

-25.09%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.21%

-41.72%

+20.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.49%

-46.36%

+13.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-15.85%

+14.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.35%

-24.66%

+17.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

2.70%

-0.03%

Volatility

CPJ1.L vs. RQFI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) is 2.28%, while Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.L) has a volatility of 8.07%. This indicates that CPJ1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RQFI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CPJ1.LRQFI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.28%

8.07%

-5.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.22%

12.34%

-3.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.38%

16.90%

-5.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.35%

20.88%

-1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.53%

21.72%

-3.19%

CPJ1.L vs. RQFI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPJ1.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RQFI.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

CPJ1.L vs. RQFI.L - Dividend Comparison

CPJ1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RQFI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPJ1.L
iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RQFI.L
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D		1.51%1.77%1.46%1.99%1.88%0.93%1.26%0.76%2.23%1.92%1.69%0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

CPJ1.L and RQFI.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CPJ1.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CPJ1.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RQFI.L.

CPJ1.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while RQFI.L is China Equities. CPJ1.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while RQFI.L tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CPJ1.L and 0.65% for RQFI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPJ1.L and RQFI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer