PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPJ1.L vs. JRCD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPJ1.L vs. JRCD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) and JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRCD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPJ1.L achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly lower than JRCD.L's 10,830.73% return.


CPJ1.L

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.98%
6M
7.32%
YTD
10.58%
1Y
16.07%
3Y*
11.78%
5Y*
6.51%
10Y*
7.36%

JRCD.L

1D
-1.35%
1M
9,704.39%
6M
4.69%
YTD
10,830.73%
1Y
33.08%
3Y*
9.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPJ1.L vs. JRCD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CPJ1.L
iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc
10.58%12.05%6.89%0.15%6.40%
JRCD.L
JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)
10,830.73%-98.80%11.42%-17.74%-9.39%

Correlation

The correlation between CPJ1.L and JRCD.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2022

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPJ1.L vs. JRCD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPJ1.L
CPJ1.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
CPJ1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

JRCD.L
JRCD.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
JRCD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRCD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRCD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
JRCD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRCD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPJ1.L vs. JRCD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) and JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRCD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CPJ1.LJRCD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-278.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

90.48

-89.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

0.33

+1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.01

0.65

+5.36

CPJ1.L vs. JRCD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPJ1.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the JRCD.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPJ1.L and JRCD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CPJ1.L vs. JRCD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPJ1.L drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, smaller than the maximum JRCD.L drawdown of -99.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPJ1.L and JRCD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPJ1.LJRCD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.49%

-99.20%

+66.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-99.06%

+91.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.21%

-99.15%

+77.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-6.35%

+4.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.35%

-22.45%

+15.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

49.56%

-46.89%

Volatility

CPJ1.L vs. JRCD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) is 2.28%, while JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRCD.L) has a volatility of 458.17%. This indicates that CPJ1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JRCD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPJ1.LJRCD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.28%

458.17%

-455.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.22%

1,384.01%

-1,374.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.38%

27,639.04%

-27,627.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.35%

13,289.67%

-13,270.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.53%

13,289.67%

-13,271.14%

CPJ1.L vs. JRCD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPJ1.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than JRCD.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPJ1.L vs. JRCD.L - Dividend Comparison

CPJ1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JRCD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CPJ1.L
iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JRCD.L
JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)
1.64%203.95%1.97%1.67%1.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


CPJ1.L and JRCD.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CPJ1.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CPJ1.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JRCD.L.

CPJ1.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while JRCD.L is China Equities. CPJ1.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while JRCD.L tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CPJ1.L and 0.40% for JRCD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPJ1.L and JRCD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer