PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPJ1.L vs. FLRK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPJ1.L vs. FLRK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CPJ1.L is traded in GBp, while FLRK.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FLRK.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPJ1.L achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly lower than FLRK.L's 111.17% return.


CPJ1.L

1D
-0.60%
1M
0.44%
YTD
8.83%
6M
9.62%
1Y
17.48%
3Y*
10.56%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
8.53%

FLRK.L

1D
-5.06%
1M
19.12%
YTD
111.17%
6M
129.46%
1Y
234.17%
3Y*
46.37%
5Y*
20.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPJ1.L vs. FLRK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CPJ1.L
iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc
8.83%12.05%6.89%0.15%4.86%5.71%3.46%1.66%
FLRK.L
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF
111.17%82.09%-20.56%14.16%-19.37%-5.90%42.60%-14.15%

Correlation

The correlation between CPJ1.L and FLRK.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2019

0.59

The correlation between CPJ1.L and FLRK.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CPJ1.L vs. FLRK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CPJ1.L
FLRK.L

Financial Services

45.5%
8.7%

Basic Materials

15.5%
2.4%

Industrials

8.6%
17.7%

Real Estate

7.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
5.5%

Utilities

3.6%
0.4%

Healthcare

3.2%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
1.7%

Communication Services

2.9%
2.3%

Energy

2.8%
0.9%

Technology

1.1%
57.4%

Financial Services

CPJ1.L
45.5%
FLRK.L
8.7%

Basic Materials

CPJ1.L
15.5%
FLRK.L
2.4%

Industrials

CPJ1.L
8.6%
FLRK.L
17.7%

Real Estate

CPJ1.L
7.9%
FLRK.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

CPJ1.L
6.1%
FLRK.L
5.5%

Utilities

CPJ1.L
3.6%
FLRK.L
0.4%

Healthcare

CPJ1.L
3.2%
FLRK.L
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

CPJ1.L
2.9%
FLRK.L
1.7%

Communication Services

CPJ1.L
2.9%
FLRK.L
2.3%

Energy

CPJ1.L
2.8%
FLRK.L
0.9%

Technology

CPJ1.L
1.1%
FLRK.L
57.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPJ1.L vs. FLRK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPJ1.L
CPJ1.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CPJ1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FLRK.L
FLRK.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FLRK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPJ1.L vs. FLRK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPJ1.LFLRK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.85

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

10.98

-8.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.27

39.30

-32.03

CPJ1.L vs. FLRK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPJ1.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the FLRK.L Sharpe Ratio of 6.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPJ1.L and FLRK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPJ1.LFLRK.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

6.24

-4.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.81

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.67

-0.22

Drawdowns

CPJ1.L vs. FLRK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPJ1.L drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, smaller than the maximum FLRK.L drawdown of -41.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPJ1.L and FLRK.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPJ1.LFLRK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.49%

-41.57%

+9.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-21.18%

+13.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.15%

-27.82%

+10.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.61%

-38.68%

+21.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.97%

-5.62%

+2.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.90%

-19.95%

+13.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

5.93%

-3.53%

Volatility

CPJ1.L vs. FLRK.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) is 3.70%, while Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that CPJ1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLRK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPJ1.LFLRK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

18.09%

-14.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.65%

32.92%

-24.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.99%

37.31%

-26.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.74%

25.31%

-11.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.93%

27.31%

-11.38%

CPJ1.L vs. FLRK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPJ1.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRK.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CPJ1.L vs. FLRK.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CPJ1.L nor FLRK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CPJ1.L and FLRK.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLRK.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLRK.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CPJ1.L.

CPJ1.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while FLRK.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CPJ1.L and 0.09% for FLRK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPJ1.L and FLRK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer