PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPJ1.L vs. CSP1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPJ1.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPJ1.L achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly lower than CSP1.L's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, CPJ1.L has underperformed CSP1.L with an annualized return of 8.53%, while CSP1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.07% annualized return.


CPJ1.L

1D
-0.60%
1M
0.44%
YTD
8.83%
6M
9.62%
1Y
17.48%
3Y*
10.56%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
8.53%

CSP1.L

1D
0.05%
1M
5.54%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.48%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
14.94%
10Y*
16.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPJ1.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CPJ1.L
iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc
8.83%12.05%6.89%0.15%4.86%5.71%3.46%14.30%-5.53%15.18%
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.55%9.37%27.35%19.79%-9.05%31.07%13.65%26.42%0.01%10.83%

Correlation

The correlation between CPJ1.L and CSP1.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2011

0.63

The correlation between CPJ1.L and CSP1.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (3 years) to 0.68 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CPJ1.L vs. CSP1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CPJ1.L
CSP1.L

Financial Services

45.5%
11.3%

Basic Materials

15.5%
1.7%

Industrials

8.6%
7.9%

Real Estate

7.9%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
9.9%

Utilities

3.6%
2.2%

Healthcare

3.2%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
4.7%

Communication Services

2.9%
10.7%

Energy

2.8%
3.4%

Technology

1.1%
38.0%

Financial Services

CPJ1.L
45.5%
CSP1.L
11.3%

Basic Materials

CPJ1.L
15.5%
CSP1.L
1.7%

Industrials

CPJ1.L
8.6%
CSP1.L
7.9%

Real Estate

CPJ1.L
7.9%
CSP1.L
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

CPJ1.L
6.1%
CSP1.L
9.9%

Utilities

CPJ1.L
3.6%
CSP1.L
2.2%

Healthcare

CPJ1.L
3.2%
CSP1.L
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

CPJ1.L
2.9%
CSP1.L
4.7%

Communication Services

CPJ1.L
2.9%
CSP1.L
10.7%

Energy

CPJ1.L
2.8%
CSP1.L
3.4%

Technology

CPJ1.L
1.1%
CSP1.L
38.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPJ1.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPJ1.L
CPJ1.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CPJ1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

CSP1.L
CSP1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPJ1.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPJ1.LCSP1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.51

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

4.07

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.27

14.99

-7.72

CPJ1.L vs. CSP1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPJ1.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPJ1.L and CSP1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPJ1.LCSP1.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

2.73

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

1.04

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

1.03

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

1.09

-0.64

Drawdowns

CPJ1.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPJ1.L drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, which is greater than CSP1.L's maximum drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPJ1.L and CSP1.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPJ1.LCSP1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.49%

-25.48%

-7.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-7.12%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.15%

-20.77%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.61%

-20.77%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.49%

-25.48%

-7.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.97%

-0.24%

-2.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.90%

-3.32%

-3.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

1.94%

+0.46%

Volatility

CPJ1.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that CPJ1.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPJ1.LCSP1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

2.62%

+1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.65%

7.16%

+1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.99%

10.62%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.74%

14.31%

-0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.93%

15.57%

+0.36%

CPJ1.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPJ1.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CPJ1.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CPJ1.L nor CSP1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CPJ1.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CPJ1.L.

CPJ1.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. CPJ1.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CPJ1.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPJ1.L and CSP1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer