CPHY vs. HYLB

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CPHY (F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF) and HYLB (Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - CPHY tracks the Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. High Yield Bond Index while HYLB tracks the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CPHY charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for HYLB.

Performance

CPHY vs. HYLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF (CPHY) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPHY achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than HYLB's 1.65% return.

CPHY

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 0.42%
• 6M: 0.83%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HYLB

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 1.65%
• 6M: 2.09%
• 1Y: 6.78%
• 3Y*: 8.79%
• 5Y*: 4.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPHY vs. HYLB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CPHY F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF	0.42%	2.31%
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	1.65%	2.94%

Correlation

The correlation between CPHY and HYLB is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025	0.93

Return for Risk

CPHY vs. HYLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYLB

HYLB Risk / Return Rank: 62
HYLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
HYLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
HYLB Omega Ratio Rank: 61
HYLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
HYLB Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPHY vs. HYLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF (CPHY) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CPHY	HYLB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	0.58	+0.37

Drawdowns

CPHY vs. HYLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPHY drawdown since its inception was -2.51%, smaller than the maximum HYLB drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPHY and HYLB.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPHY	HYLB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.51%	-22.91%	+20.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.27%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.51%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.57%	-0.09%	-0.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.56%	-2.43%	+1.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.53%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CPHY	HYLB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.19%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.92%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.58%	3.70%	-0.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.58%	7.47%	-3.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.58%	8.18%	-4.60%

CPHY vs. HYLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPHY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than HYLB's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

CPHY vs. HYLB - Dividend Comparison

CPHY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HYLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CPHY F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	6.48%	6.29%	6.31%	5.84%	5.53%	4.45%	5.22%	5.71%	5.95%	5.85%	0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPHY and HYLB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, CPHY and HYLB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, CPHY or HYLB?

On fees, HYLB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CPHY or HYLB?

HYLB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CPHY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CPHY or HYLB?

HYLB has the higher dividend yield at 6.48%, compared with 0.00% for CPHY.

What is the main difference between CPHY and HYLB?

CPHY tracks Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. High Yield Bond Index, while HYLB tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: F/m Investments and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CPHY and 0.15% for HYLB.