CPHY vs. LFSC
CPHY (F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF) and LFSC (F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CPHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. High Yield Bond Index, while LFSC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by F/m. CPHY is passively managed, while LFSC is actively managed. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CPHY charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for LFSC.
Performance
CPHY vs. LFSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPHY achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than LFSC's 24.40% return.
CPHY
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- 6M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
LFSC
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- -1.28%
- 6M
- 27.81%
- YTD
- 24.40%
- 1Y
- 86.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 40.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $47.80K | $33.82K | $41.16K | |
| $207.45K | $324.22K | $187.45K |
CPHY vs. LFSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CPHY F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF | 0.43% | 2.43% |
LFSC F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF | 24.40% | 41.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPHY and LFSC is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPHY vs. LFSC — Risk / Return Rank
CPHY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LFSC
CPHY vs. LFSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF (CPHY) and F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CPHY | LFSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.49 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.45 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CPHY vs. LFSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPHY drawdown since its inception was -2.51%, smaller than the maximum LFSC drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPHY and LFSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPHY | LFSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.51% | -29.74% | +27.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -3.85% | +3.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.54% | -7.26% | +6.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.76% | — |
Volatility
CPHY vs. LFSC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPHY | LFSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.45% | 27.28% | -23.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.45% | 28.89% | -25.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.45% | 28.89% | -25.44% |
CPHY vs. LFSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPHY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than LFSC's 0.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
CPHY vs. LFSC - Dividend Comparison
Neither CPHY nor LFSC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CPHY and LFSC have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CPHY is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CPHY is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for LFSC.
CPHY and LFSC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
CPHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while LFSC is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CPHY and 0.54% for LFSC.
Find the right allocation for CPHY and LFSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer