CPGAX vs. VT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CPGAX (American Funds Global Growth Portfolio) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CPGAX returned 13.05%/yr vs 12.96%/yr for VT. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CPGAX charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.

Performance

CPGAX vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Global Growth Portfolio (CPGAX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPGAX achieves a 13.53% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 10.06% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CPGAX having a 13.05% annualized return and VT not far behind at 12.96%.

CPGAX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 3.62%
• YTD: 13.53%
• 6M: 12.98%
• 1Y: 29.50%
• 3Y*: 20.71%
• 5Y*: 8.84%
• 10Y*: 13.05%

VT

• 1D: -2.05%
• 1M: -0.44%
• YTD: 10.06%
• 6M: 9.32%
• 1Y: 25.71%
• 3Y*: 19.92%
• 5Y*: 10.51%
• 10Y*: 12.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPGAX vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CPGAX American Funds Global Growth Portfolio	13.53%	22.99%	14.81%	24.05%	-25.77%	12.89%	27.36%	27.87%	-8.99%	28.56%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	10.06%	22.43%	16.49%	22.02%	-18.00%	18.27%	16.59%	26.81%	-9.76%	24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between CPGAX and VT is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012	0.96

The correlation between CPGAX and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CPGAX vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPGAX

CPGAX Risk / Return Rank: 55
CPGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
CPGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
CPGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
CPGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
CPGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 59
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 58
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPGAX vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Global Growth Portfolio (CPGAX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CPGAX	VT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	1.91	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	2.62	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.35	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	2.67	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.71	11.57	+0.14

CPGAX vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPGAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPGAX and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CPGAX vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPGAX drawdown since its inception was -34.42%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPGAX and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPGAX	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.42%	-50.27%	+15.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.33%	-9.67%	-1.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.99%	-16.51%	-1.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.42%	-26.38%	-8.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.42%	-34.24%	-0.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.80%	+2.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.92%	-7.00%	+1.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	2.23%	+0.38%

Volatility

CPGAX vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Global Growth Portfolio (CPGAX) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 5.65%. This indicates that CPGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPGAX	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.43%	5.65%	+0.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.88%	11.32%	+1.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.37%	13.58%	+1.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.26%	16.19%	+1.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.37%	17.20%	+0.17%

CPGAX vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPGAX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

CPGAX vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

CPGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, more than VT's 1.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CPGAX American Funds Global Growth Portfolio	4.93%	5.59%	4.29%	0.92%	7.95%	3.33%	0.77%	4.89%	5.69%	6.21%	3.66%	3.92%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.61%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPGAX and VT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, CPGAX and VT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CPGAX or VT?

CPGAX has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to VT (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPGAX dropped -34.42% vs VT's -50.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CPGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.