PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPGAX vs. PGVFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPGAX vs. PGVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Global Growth Portfolio (CPGAX) and Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPGAX achieves a 13.11% return, which is significantly lower than PGVFX's 19.64% return. Over the past 10 years, CPGAX has outperformed PGVFX with an annualized return of 12.51%, while PGVFX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.88% annualized return.


CPGAX

1D
0.34%
1M
6.19%
YTD
13.11%
6M
14.29%
1Y
30.48%
3Y*
20.82%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*
12.51%

PGVFX

1D
0.41%
1M
4.77%
YTD
19.64%
6M
23.13%
1Y
38.95%
3Y*
21.61%
5Y*
9.53%
10Y*
10.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPGAX vs. PGVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CPGAX
American Funds Global Growth Portfolio
13.11%22.99%14.81%24.05%-25.77%12.89%27.36%27.87%-8.99%28.56%
PGVFX
Polaris Global Value Fund
19.64%27.01%5.33%14.76%-12.00%15.38%6.65%22.83%-12.64%20.60%

Correlation

The correlation between CPGAX and PGVFX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2012

0.79

The correlation between CPGAX and PGVFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPGAX vs. PGVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPGAX
CPGAX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CPGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
CPGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

PGVFX
PGVFX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PGVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PGVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPGAX vs. PGVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Global Growth Portfolio (CPGAX) and Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPGAXPGVFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.63

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

4.46

-1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.10

16.13

-4.03

CPGAX vs. PGVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPGAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is lower than the PGVFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPGAX and PGVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPGAXPGVFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

3.32

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.69

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.69

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.49

+0.26

Drawdowns

CPGAX vs. PGVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPGAX drawdown since its inception was -34.42%, smaller than the maximum PGVFX drawdown of -68.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPGAX and PGVFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPGAXPGVFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.42%

-68.09%

+33.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

-8.76%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.99%

-12.53%

-5.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.42%

-27.58%

-6.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.42%

-41.26%

+6.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.93%

-11.30%

+5.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

2.42%

+0.13%

Volatility

CPGAX vs. PGVFX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Global Growth Portfolio (CPGAX) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX) at 4.10%. This indicates that CPGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPGAXPGVFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

4.10%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.59%

9.55%

+2.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.26%

11.75%

+2.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.07%

13.80%

+3.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.29%

15.87%

+1.42%

CPGAX vs. PGVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPGAX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PGVFX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPGAX vs. PGVFX - Dividend Comparison

CPGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, more than PGVFX's 4.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPGAX
American Funds Global Growth Portfolio
4.94%5.59%4.29%0.92%7.95%3.33%0.77%4.89%5.69%6.21%3.66%3.92%
PGVFX
Polaris Global Value Fund
4.32%5.17%5.65%1.68%3.55%4.05%1.55%3.69%3.39%1.50%1.32%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


CPGAX and PGVFX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CPGAX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to PGVFX (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPGAX dropped -34.42% vs PGVFX's -68.09%.

PGVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPGAX and PGVFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer