CPB vs. VRIG
CPB (Campbell Soup Company) is a stock, while VRIG (Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Invesco. Over the past 5 years, CPB returned -10.11%/yr vs 4.49%/yr for VRIG. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CPB vs. VRIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPB achieves a -17.56% return, which is significantly lower than VRIG's 2.14% return.
CPB
- 1D
- 4.86%
- 1M
- 8.07%
- YTD
- -17.56%
- 6M
- -18.00%
- 1Y
- -26.81%
- 3Y*
- -17.89%
- 5Y*
- -10.11%
- 10Y*
- -6.69%
VRIG
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 2.14%
- 6M
- 2.25%
- 1Y
- 4.94%
- 3Y*
- 5.95%
- 5Y*
- 4.49%
- 10Y*
- —
CPB vs. VRIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPB Campbell Soup Company | -17.56% | -30.47% | 0.09% | -21.45% | 34.84% | -7.19% | 0.72% | 55.19% | -29.12% | -18.30% |
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 2.14% | 5.05% | 6.81% | 7.37% | 0.99% | 1.06% | 1.76% | 4.57% | 0.51% | 3.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPB and VRIG is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPB vs. VRIG — Risk / Return Rank
CPB
VRIG
CPB vs. VRIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Campbell Soup Company (CPB) and Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CPB | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -10.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -25.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 5.34 | -4.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | 62.12 | -62.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 317.44 | -318.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CPB vs. VRIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPB drawdown since its inception was -64.65%, which is greater than VRIG's maximum drawdown of -13.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPB and VRIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPB | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.65% | -13.04% | -51.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.53% | -0.08% | -38.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.07% | -0.78% | -57.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.04% | -2.28% | -57.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.56% | 0.00% | -55.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.21% | -0.27% | -21.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.52% | 0.02% | +21.50% |
Volatility
CPB vs. VRIG - Volatility Comparison
Campbell Soup Company (CPB) has a higher volatility of 10.71% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) at 0.12%. This indicates that CPB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPB | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.71% | 0.12% | +10.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.13% | 0.36% | +22.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.34% | 0.49% | +29.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.31% | 1.29% | +23.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.70% | 3.79% | +21.91% |
Dividends
CPB vs. VRIG - Dividend Comparison
CPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.01%, more than VRIG's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPB Campbell Soup Company | 7.01% | 5.60% | 3.53% | 3.42% | 2.61% | 3.41% | 2.90% | 2.83% | 4.24% | 2.91% | 2.13% | 2.37% |
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 4.71% | 4.99% | 6.09% | 5.97% | 2.39% | 0.78% | 1.57% | 3.12% | 2.89% | 2.31% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CPB and VRIG have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CPB has higher volatility (10.71%) compared to VRIG (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPB dropped -64.65% vs VRIG's -13.04%.
VRIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.08 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CPB and VRIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer