PortfoliosLab logo
CPB vs. GIS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CPB and GIS is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CPB vs. GIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Campbell Soup Company (CPB) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CPB:

-0.94

GIS:

-0.88

Sortino Ratio

CPB:

-1.29

GIS:

-1.19

Omega Ratio

CPB:

0.85

GIS:

0.86

Calmar Ratio

CPB:

-0.64

GIS:

-0.54

Martin Ratio

CPB:

-1.36

GIS:

-1.44

Ulcer Index

CPB:

17.42%

GIS:

13.86%

Daily Std Dev

CPB:

24.62%

GIS:

21.89%

Max Drawdown

CPB:

-62.92%

GIS:

-45.08%

Current Drawdown

CPB:

-35.79%

GIS:

-35.38%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CPB:

$10.23B

GIS:

$29.79B

EPS

CPB:

$1.73

GIS:

$4.55

PE Ratio

CPB:

19.83

GIS:

11.96

PEG Ratio

CPB:

0.58

GIS:

3.47

PS Ratio

CPB:

1.01

GIS:

1.52

PB Ratio

CPB:

2.68

GIS:

3.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

CPB:

$7.75B

GIS:

$19.64B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CPB:

$2.36B

GIS:

$6.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

CPB:

$1.10B

GIS:

$3.99B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPB achieves a -15.74% return, which is significantly lower than GIS's -12.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CPB has underperformed GIS with an annualized return of -0.13%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively higher 3.04% annualized return.


CPB

YTD

-15.74%

1M

-7.32%

6M

-21.35%

1Y

-22.91%

5Y*

-5.69%

10Y*

-0.13%

GIS

YTD

-12.91%

1M

-5.96%

6M

-14.17%

1Y

-19.02%

5Y*

0.53%

10Y*

3.04%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CPB vs. GIS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CPB is 99
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CPB is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CPB is 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CPB is 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CPB is 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CPB is 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

GIS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GIS is 1010
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GIS is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GIS is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GIS is 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GIS is 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GIS is 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CPB vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Campbell Soup Company (CPB) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CPB Sharpe Ratio is -0.94, which is comparable to the GIS Sharpe Ratio of -0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPB and GIS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CPB vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison

CPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, less than GIS's 4.41% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CPB
Campbell Soup Company
4.35%3.53%3.42%2.61%3.41%2.90%2.83%4.24%2.91%2.13%2.37%2.84%
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
4.41%3.73%3.47%2.50%3.03%3.37%3.66%5.03%3.27%3.01%3.00%3.02%

Drawdowns

CPB vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPB drawdown since its inception was -62.92%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPB and GIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CPB vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison

Campbell Soup Company (CPB) has a higher volatility of 6.39% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 5.61%. This indicates that CPB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CPB vs. GIS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Campbell Soup Company and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00BJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
2.69B
4.84B
(CPB) Total Revenue
(GIS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CPB vs. GIS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Campbell Soup Company and General Mills, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

28.0%30.0%32.0%34.0%36.0%JulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
30.5%
33.9%
(CPB) Gross Margin
(GIS) Gross Margin
CPB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Campbell Soup Company reported a gross profit of 819.00M and revenue of 2.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.5%.

GIS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.64B and revenue of 4.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.

CPB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Campbell Soup Company reported an operating income of 327.00M and revenue of 2.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.2%.

GIS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 891.40M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.

CPB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Campbell Soup Company reported a net income of 173.00M and revenue of 2.69B, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.

GIS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 625.60M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.