PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPB vs. MKC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CPB vs. MKC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Campbell Soup Company (CPB) and McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPB achieves a -15.45% return, which is significantly higher than MKC's -27.49% return. Over the past 10 years, CPB has underperformed MKC with an annualized return of -6.46%, while MKC has yielded a comparatively higher 1.82% annualized return.


CPB

1D
0.35%
1M
12.09%
YTD
-15.45%
6M
-18.01%
1Y
-27.52%
3Y*
-17.59%
5Y*
-9.79%
10Y*
-6.46%

MKC

1D
-0.57%
1M
7.35%
YTD
-27.49%
6M
-25.55%
1Y
-33.55%
3Y*
-16.44%
5Y*
-9.29%
10Y*
1.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPB vs. MKC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CPB
Campbell Soup Company
-15.45%-30.47%0.09%-21.45%34.84%-7.19%0.72%55.19%-29.12%-18.30%
MKC
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
-27.49%-8.33%13.97%-15.68%-12.65%2.67%14.70%23.65%39.01%11.34%

Correlation

The correlation between CPB and MKC is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.37

The correlation between CPB and MKC shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.53 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CPB:

$6.82B

MKC:

$13.19B

EPS

CPB:

$2.03

MKC:

$6.10

PE Ratio

CPB:

11.22

MKC:

8.02

PS Ratio

CPB:

0.69

MKC:

1.85

PB Ratio

CPB:

1.69

MKC:

1.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

CPB:

$9.93B

MKC:

$7.11B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CPB:

$2.86B

MKC:

$2.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

CPB:

$1.42B

MKC:

$1.22B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPB vs. MKC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPB
CPB Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
CPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPB Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
CPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPB Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

MKC
MKC Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
MKC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MKC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MKC Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
MKC Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MKC Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPB vs. MKC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Campbell Soup Company (CPB) and McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CPBMKCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

0.80

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

-0.85

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.33

-1.69

+0.36

CPB vs. MKC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPB Sharpe Ratio is -0.94, which is comparable to the MKC Sharpe Ratio of -1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPB and MKC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CPB vs. MKC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPB drawdown since its inception was -64.65%, which is greater than MKC's maximum drawdown of -52.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPB and MKC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPBMKCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.65%

-52.02%

-12.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.53%

-39.50%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.07%

-47.65%

-10.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.04%

-52.02%

-8.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.04%

-52.02%

-8.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.42%

-48.49%

-5.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.19%

-11.03%

-11.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.81%

19.92%

+0.89%

Volatility

CPB vs. MKC - Volatility Comparison

Campbell Soup Company (CPB) has a higher volatility of 7.06% compared to McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) at 6.12%. This indicates that CPB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MKC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPBMKCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.06%

6.12%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.72%

23.28%

-1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.25%

28.06%

+1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.00%

24.34%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.56%

24.17%

+1.39%

Dividends

CPB vs. MKC - Dividend Comparison

CPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.84%, more than MKC's 3.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPB
Campbell Soup Company
6.84%5.60%3.53%3.42%2.61%3.41%2.90%2.83%4.24%2.91%2.13%2.37%
MKC
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
3.80%2.69%2.24%2.32%1.81%1.44%1.68%1.37%1.53%1.89%1.89%1.91%

Financials

CPB vs. MKC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Campbell Soup Company and McCormick & Company, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.60B1.80B2.00B2.20B2.40B2.60B2.80B20222023202420252026
2.37B
1.87B
(CPB) Total Revenue
(MKC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CPB vs. MKC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Campbell Soup Company and McCormick & Company, Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

28.0%30.0%32.0%34.0%36.0%38.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
27.5%
37.8%
Portfolio components
CPB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Campbell Soup Company reported a gross profit of 650.00M and revenue of 2.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.5%.

MKC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 708.90M and revenue of 1.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.8%.

CPB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Campbell Soup Company reported an operating income of 239.00M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.

MKC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported an operating income of 227.50M and revenue of 1.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.

CPB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Campbell Soup Company reported a net income of 124.00M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.

MKC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 1.87B, resulting in a net margin of 54.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CPB and MKC have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CPB has higher volatility (7.06%) compared to MKC (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPB dropped -64.65% vs MKC's -52.02%.

CPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.94 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPB and MKC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer