PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPAY vs. LMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CPAY vs. LMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Corpay, Inc. (CPAY) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPAY achieves a 18.34% return, which is significantly higher than LMT's 13.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CPAY has underperformed LMT with an annualized return of 9.48%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively higher 11.37% annualized return.


CPAY

1D
1.50%
1M
7.50%
YTD
18.34%
6M
12.66%
1Y
1.73%
3Y*
14.01%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
9.48%

LMT

1D
-1.52%
1M
4.60%
YTD
13.04%
6M
13.84%
1Y
18.25%
3Y*
8.98%
5Y*
9.78%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPAY vs. LMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CPAY
Corpay, Inc.
18.34%-11.08%19.75%53.86%-17.94%-17.96%-5.18%54.92%-3.49%35.97%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
13.04%2.47%10.02%-4.31%40.48%3.15%-6.49%52.55%-16.35%31.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CPAY and LMT is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2010

0.29

Over the past year, the correlation between CPAY and LMT has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CPAY:

$24.37B

LMT:

$124.87B

EPS

CPAY:

$16.74

LMT:

$20.61

PE Ratio

CPAY:

21.27

LMT:

26.21

PS Ratio

CPAY:

5.23

LMT:

1.67

PB Ratio

CPAY:

6.94

LMT:

16.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

CPAY:

$4.78B

LMT:

$75.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CPAY:

$2.57B

LMT:

$7.37B

EBITDA (TTM)

CPAY:

$2.55B

LMT:

$8.09B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPAY vs. LMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPAY
CPAY Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

LMT
LMT Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
LMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMT Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
LMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMT Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPAY vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corpay, Inc. (CPAY) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CPAYLMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.14

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

0.73

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.15

1.69

-1.54

CPAY vs. LMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPAY Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the LMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPAY and LMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CPAY vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPAY drawdown since its inception was -50.13%, smaller than the maximum LMT drawdown of -79.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPAY and LMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPAYLMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.13%

-79.29%

+29.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.90%

-25.15%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.54%

-31.79%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.63%

-31.79%

-9.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.13%

-36.67%

-13.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.58%

-19.63%

+11.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.33%

-26.83%

+13.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.35%

10.81%

+1.54%

Volatility

CPAY vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison

Corpay, Inc. (CPAY) has a higher volatility of 9.20% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 7.02%. This indicates that CPAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPAYLMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.20%

7.02%

+2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.53%

20.04%

+9.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.70%

26.71%

+10.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.43%

22.99%

+9.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.93%

23.76%

+9.17%

Dividends

CPAY vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison

CPAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPAY
Corpay, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.53%2.76%2.62%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%

Financials

CPAY vs. LMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Corpay, Inc. and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
1.26B
18.02B
(CPAY) Total Revenue
(LMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CPAY vs. LMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Corpay, Inc. and Lockheed Martin Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
11.5%
Portfolio components
CPAY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corpay, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.08B and revenue of 18.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

CPAY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corpay, Inc. reported an operating income of 636.17M and revenue of 1.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 50.5%.

LMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported an operating income of 2.06B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

CPAY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corpay, Inc. reported a net income of 350.07M and revenue of 1.26B, resulting in a net margin of 27.8%.

LMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a net income of 1.49B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CPAY and LMT have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CPAY has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to LMT (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPAY dropped -50.13% vs LMT's -79.29%.

LMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPAY and LMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer