PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPAI vs. IJH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CPAI vs. IJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CPAI vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CPAI
Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF
4.96%17.79%28.37%6.69%
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
3.42%7.42%13.92%9.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPAI achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly higher than IJH's 3.42% return.


CPAI

1D
0.72%
1M
-6.74%
YTD
4.96%
6M
6.83%
1Y
26.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IJH

1D
0.84%
1M
-5.33%
YTD
3.42%
6M
4.74%
1Y
17.69%
3Y*
12.37%
5Y*
6.75%
10Y*
10.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CPAI vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPAI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CPAI vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPAI
CPAI Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
CPAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPAI Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CPAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPAI Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

IJH
IJH Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
IJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJH Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJH Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPAI vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPAIIJHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.20

0.84

+0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.68

1.32

+0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.18

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

1.29

+0.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.56

5.56

+2.00

CPAI vs. IJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the IJH Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPAI and IJH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPAIIJHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

0.84

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.35

0.44

+0.91

Correlation

The correlation between CPAI and IJH is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CPAI vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison

CPAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than IJH's 1.30% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPAI
Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF
0.85%0.89%0.41%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
1.30%1.36%1.33%1.46%1.68%1.18%1.28%1.63%1.72%1.19%1.60%1.56%

Drawdowns

CPAI vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPAI drawdown since its inception was -21.46%, smaller than the maximum IJH drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPAI and IJH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CPAIIJHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.46%

-55.07%

+33.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.63%

-14.16%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.74%

-5.34%

-1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.10%

-7.61%

+4.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

3.29%

+0.25%

Volatility

CPAI vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison

Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI) has a higher volatility of 7.46% compared to iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) at 6.40%. This indicates that CPAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CPAIIJHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.46%

6.40%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.95%

11.93%

+3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.20%

21.08%

+1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.20%

19.74%

-0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.20%

21.16%

-1.96%