PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPAG vs. XAGG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPAG vs. XAGG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (CPAG) and iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (XAGG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CPAG is traded in USD, while XAGG.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XAGG.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPAG achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than XAGG.TO's 0.16% return.


CPAG

1D
0.14%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.13%
6M
0.09%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XAGG.TO

1D
0.61%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.16%
6M
0.16%
1Y
4.47%
3Y*
3.80%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPAG vs. XAGG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CPAG and XAGG.TO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025

0.55

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPAG vs. XAGG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPAG

XAGG.TO
XAGG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
XAGG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAGG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAGG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
XAGG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAGG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPAG vs. XAGG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (CPAG) and iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (XAGG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CPAG vs. XAGG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPAGXAGG.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

-0.10

+0.89

Drawdowns

CPAG vs. XAGG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPAG drawdown since its inception was -2.78%, smaller than the maximum XAGG.TO drawdown of -17.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPAG and XAGG.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPAGXAGG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-17.29%

+14.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.54%

-2.02%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.74%

-7.29%

+6.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

Volatility

CPAG vs. XAGG.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPAGXAGG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

4.73%

-1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.67%

8.31%

-4.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.67%

8.31%

-4.64%

CPAG vs. XAGG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPAG has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than XAGG.TO's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPAG vs. XAGG.TO - Dividend Comparison

CPAG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XAGG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CPAG
F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XAGG.TO
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF
4.07%3.86%3.07%2.59%1.67%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


CPAG and XAGG.TO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XAGG.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XAGG.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for CPAG.

CPAG tracks Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, while XAGG.TO tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: F/m Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for CPAG and 0.10% for XAGG.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPAG and XAGG.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer