CPAG vs. UTWY
CPAG (F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and UTWY (F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CPAG is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, while UTWY is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 20 Year Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CPAG charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for UTWY.
Performance
CPAG vs. UTWY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPAG achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly higher than UTWY's 0.13% return.
CPAG
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UTWY
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 0.04%
- 1Y
- 3.50%
- 3Y*
- -0.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CPAG vs. UTWY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CPAG F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.18% | 2.26% |
UTWY F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF | 0.13% | 2.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPAG and UTWY is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPAG vs. UTWY — Risk / Return Rank
CPAG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UTWY
CPAG vs. UTWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (CPAG) and F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CPAG | UTWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.34 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CPAG vs. UTWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPAG drawdown since its inception was -2.78%, smaller than the maximum UTWY drawdown of -18.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPAG and UTWY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPAG | UTWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.78% | -18.19% | +15.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -5.30% | +3.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.79% | -7.00% | +6.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.62% | — |
Volatility
CPAG vs. UTWY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPAG | UTWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70% | 7.89% | -4.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 11.05% | -7.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 11.05% | -7.35% |
CPAG vs. UTWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPAG has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than UTWY's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CPAG vs. UTWY - Dividend Comparison
CPAG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UTWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CPAG F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UTWY F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF | 4.65% | 4.62% | 4.56% | 2.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, CPAG and UTWY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, UTWY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UTWY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for CPAG.
UTWY has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 0.00% for CPAG.
CPAG is categorized as Total Bond Market, while UTWY is Government Bonds. CPAG tracks Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, while UTWY tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 20 Year Index. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for CPAG and 0.15% for UTWY.
Find the right allocation for CPAG and UTWY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer