CPAG vs. TBIL
CPAG (F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and TBIL (F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CPAG is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, while TBIL is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 3M Total Return USD Unhedged Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CPAG charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TBIL.
Performance
CPAG vs. TBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPAG achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than TBIL's 1.69% return.
CPAG
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TBIL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CPAG vs. TBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CPAG F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.18% | 2.26% |
TBIL F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF | 1.69% | 1.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPAG and TBIL is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPAG vs. TBIL — Risk / Return Rank
CPAG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TBIL
CPAG vs. TBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (CPAG) and F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CPAG | TBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 17.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 195.79 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 929.44 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CPAG vs. TBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPAG drawdown since its inception was -2.78%, which is greater than TBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPAG and TBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPAG | TBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.78% | -0.10% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | 0.00% | -1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.79% | -0.00% | -0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
CPAG vs. TBIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPAG | TBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70% | 0.29% | +3.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 0.32% | +3.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 0.32% | +3.38% |
CPAG vs. TBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPAG has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than TBIL's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CPAG vs. TBIL - Dividend Comparison
CPAG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPAG F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TBIL F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF | 3.81% | 4.07% | 5.02% | 5.00% | 1.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CPAG and TBIL have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for CPAG.
TBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 0.00% for CPAG.
CPAG is categorized as Total Bond Market, while TBIL is Ultrashort Bond. CPAG tracks Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, while TBIL tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 3M Total Return USD Unhedged Index. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for CPAG and 0.15% for TBIL.
Find the right allocation for CPAG and TBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer