PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CP9G.L vs. FRXT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CP9G.L vs. FRXT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9G.L) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF (FRXT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CP9G.L vs. FRXT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CP9G.L
Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR
3.67%5.89%0.85%-0.56%-4.49%
FRXT.L
Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF
14.97%25.34%25.66%22.61%-17.25%
Different Trading Currencies

CP9G.L is traded in GBp, while FRXT.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FRXT.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CP9G.L achieves a 3.67% return, which is significantly lower than FRXT.L's 14.97% return.


CP9G.L

1D
1.92%
1M
-4.09%
YTD
3.67%
6M
2.76%
1Y
10.94%
3Y*
3.21%
5Y*
2.86%
10Y*
5.87%

FRXT.L

1D
3.43%
1M
-4.39%
YTD
14.97%
6M
23.06%
1Y
62.53%
3Y*
26.08%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CP9G.L vs. FRXT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CP9G.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FRXT.L's 0.19% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CP9G.L vs. FRXT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CP9G.L
CP9G.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
CP9G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CP9G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
CP9G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
CP9G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
CP9G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

FRXT.L
FRXT.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FRXT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRXT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRXT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FRXT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRXT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CP9G.L vs. FRXT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9G.L) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF (FRXT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CP9G.LFRXT.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.75

2.60

-1.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.09

3.18

-2.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.47

-0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

5.16

-3.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.04

18.67

-14.63

CP9G.L vs. FRXT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CP9G.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the FRXT.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CP9G.L and FRXT.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CP9G.LFRXT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

2.60

-1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.81

-0.40

Correlation

The correlation between CP9G.L and FRXT.L is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CP9G.L vs. FRXT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CP9G.L nor FRXT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CP9G.L vs. FRXT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CP9G.L drawdown since its inception was -32.32%, which is greater than FRXT.L's maximum drawdown of -28.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CP9G.L and FRXT.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CP9G.LFRXT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.32%

-28.86%

-3.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.72%

-16.68%

+7.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.43%

-5.81%

+1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.09%

-7.19%

+1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

3.30%

-0.60%

Volatility

CP9G.L vs. FRXT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9G.L) is 6.38%, while Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF (FRXT.L) has a volatility of 7.34%. This indicates that CP9G.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRXT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CP9G.LFRXT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.38%

7.34%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

15.93%

-6.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.65%

24.01%

-9.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.86%

20.12%

-6.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

20.12%

-4.40%